Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
My Attempt to Define RPG's - RPG's aren't actually Games
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 7471776" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>But is it, though. See below...</p><p></p><p> [MENTION=22779]Hussar[/MENTION], Lanefan, [MENTION=42582]pemerton[/MENTION] and [MENTION=5142]Aldarc[/MENTION] sit down at a table to play some poker. (and, probably, argue the night away <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p><p></p><p>Each starts with 100 chips. Ante is 2 per deal.</p><p></p><p>First deal - 5-card stud. Hussar does OK, Lanefan does poorly, pemerton and Aldarc just lose their ante.</p><p></p><p>Hussar 126, Lanefan 78, pemerton 98, Aldarc 98</p><p></p><p>Second deal - texas hold'em - Hussar again does quite well, with the main victim this time being pemerton as Lanefan folds after the turn. Aldarc again just loses ante.</p><p></p><p>Hussar 162, Lanefan 66, pemerton 76, Aldarc 96</p><p></p><p>Third deal - 2's and jokers wild - this time Aldarc rises and clobbers Hussar, while Lanefan and pemerton stay out of the way.</p><p></p><p>Hussar 130, Lanefan 64, pemerton 74, Aldarc 132</p><p></p><p>And so it goes, on into the night as the table-talk RPG arguments rage on.</p><p></p><p>Now, while the rules are changing with each deal, does the chip-count continuity from deal to deal mean we're playing the same game of poker through the evening? Or is "game" defined by the ruleset thus meaning we're playing a different game with each deal, and if true what term can be applied to the overall evening's play as defined by the chip count...does poker have "campaigns"? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Lanefan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 7471776, member: 29398"] But is it, though. See below... [MENTION=22779]Hussar[/MENTION], Lanefan, [MENTION=42582]pemerton[/MENTION] and [MENTION=5142]Aldarc[/MENTION] sit down at a table to play some poker. (and, probably, argue the night away :) ) Each starts with 100 chips. Ante is 2 per deal. First deal - 5-card stud. Hussar does OK, Lanefan does poorly, pemerton and Aldarc just lose their ante. Hussar 126, Lanefan 78, pemerton 98, Aldarc 98 Second deal - texas hold'em - Hussar again does quite well, with the main victim this time being pemerton as Lanefan folds after the turn. Aldarc again just loses ante. Hussar 162, Lanefan 66, pemerton 76, Aldarc 96 Third deal - 2's and jokers wild - this time Aldarc rises and clobbers Hussar, while Lanefan and pemerton stay out of the way. Hussar 130, Lanefan 64, pemerton 74, Aldarc 132 And so it goes, on into the night as the table-talk RPG arguments rage on. Now, while the rules are changing with each deal, does the chip-count continuity from deal to deal mean we're playing the same game of poker through the evening? Or is "game" defined by the ruleset thus meaning we're playing a different game with each deal, and if true what term can be applied to the overall evening's play as defined by the chip count...does poker have "campaigns"? :) Lanefan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
My Attempt to Define RPG's - RPG's aren't actually Games
Top