Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
My biggest gripe with 5e design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NotAYakk" data-source="post: 7854334" data-attributes="member: 72555"><p>Yes, HD was how hard a monster was in 1e. It was a rating that determined how challenging it was. Monsters with HD and a star where extra hard for their HD.</p><p></p><p>The first monsters a party would meet as new adventurers should be HD 1 or lower monsters in 1e. In 5e, they should be CR 1 or lower monsters.</p><p></p><p>There is a strong association between 1e HD and 5e CR. There is next to no association between 5e HD and 1e HD. <strong>Nobody</strong> should ever use 5e HD to determine how tough a monster is, if it should be on the "first level of a dungeon" or not.</p><p></p><p>There is correlation between HD and HP, and correlation between HP and CR, and correlation between CR and ATK bonus and Damage. Comparing 5e HD to 1e HD is an absolutely horrible comparison method, as someone who has played both 5e and 1e.</p><p></p><p>The monster building guidelines of 5e have you <strong>derive HD</strong> from <strong>how many HP you want it to have, its size, and its constitution bonus</strong>. Larger monsters use larger HD and hence have fewer of them, smaller monsters have smaller HD and hence have more of them.</p><p></p><p>This is why an Orc has 2 HD and so does a Kobold; the Orc has a high con (+3) and is medium sized, so has 2d8+6 = 15 HP. The Kobold has -1 Con and is small, so rolls d6 HD -- 2d6-2 is 5 HP. If the Kobold had -2 Con, it would have 3 HD and 5 HP. If it had -3 Con, it would have 5 HD ... and 5 HP. <strong>Nothing else about the monster would change</strong>, because HD is a <strong>derived stat in 5e</strong>, not the start of building a monster.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, comparing 5e CR to 1e HD is a decent comparison method. They both are a way of measuring how tough a monster is.</p><p></p><p>Go and do your comparison of 1e monsters by HD vs 5e monsters by CR. The Orc is a <strong>half level</strong> threat in 5e, and yes it has more HP than a level 1 PC and does more damage. That is why people are saying monsters in 5e ... have more HP and deal more damage than 1e ones did.</p><p></p><p>The Kobold has 2 HD, but is a 1/8 CR threat. It is 4 times weaker than an Orc.</p><p></p><p>HD, on a monster in 5e, means next to nothing. It exists pretty much only to make people who are used to HD-centric editions of D&D feel surface fuzzies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NotAYakk, post: 7854334, member: 72555"] Yes, HD was how hard a monster was in 1e. It was a rating that determined how challenging it was. Monsters with HD and a star where extra hard for their HD. The first monsters a party would meet as new adventurers should be HD 1 or lower monsters in 1e. In 5e, they should be CR 1 or lower monsters. There is a strong association between 1e HD and 5e CR. There is next to no association between 5e HD and 1e HD. [B]Nobody[/B] should ever use 5e HD to determine how tough a monster is, if it should be on the "first level of a dungeon" or not. There is correlation between HD and HP, and correlation between HP and CR, and correlation between CR and ATK bonus and Damage. Comparing 5e HD to 1e HD is an absolutely horrible comparison method, as someone who has played both 5e and 1e. The monster building guidelines of 5e have you [B]derive HD[/B] from [B]how many HP you want it to have, its size, and its constitution bonus[/B]. Larger monsters use larger HD and hence have fewer of them, smaller monsters have smaller HD and hence have more of them. This is why an Orc has 2 HD and so does a Kobold; the Orc has a high con (+3) and is medium sized, so has 2d8+6 = 15 HP. The Kobold has -1 Con and is small, so rolls d6 HD -- 2d6-2 is 5 HP. If the Kobold had -2 Con, it would have 3 HD and 5 HP. If it had -3 Con, it would have 5 HD ... and 5 HP. [B]Nothing else about the monster would change[/B], because HD is a [B]derived stat in 5e[/B], not the start of building a monster. On the other hand, comparing 5e CR to 1e HD is a decent comparison method. They both are a way of measuring how tough a monster is. Go and do your comparison of 1e monsters by HD vs 5e monsters by CR. The Orc is a [B]half level[/B] threat in 5e, and yes it has more HP than a level 1 PC and does more damage. That is why people are saying monsters in 5e ... have more HP and deal more damage than 1e ones did. The Kobold has 2 HD, but is a 1/8 CR threat. It is 4 times weaker than an Orc. HD, on a monster in 5e, means next to nothing. It exists pretty much only to make people who are used to HD-centric editions of D&D feel surface fuzzies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
My biggest gripe with 5e design
Top