Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
My biggest gripe with 5e design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 7855433" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>Meh, my point is, there are so many different ways of playing 1e, that saying "This is the way the game was played" is pointless.</p><p></p><p>I mean, even using 4d6-L, with 10 PC's, you get a LOT of PC's with stats above 16. And, let's not forget, AD&D minimum stats for classes. Rangers needed a 15 Cha, so, a 16 isn't unheard of. Druids and clerics needed wisdom. Wizards needed Int. Paladins needed a 17 Cha. So, if you had a group of 10 PC's, with 2 wizards, a cleric, a druid, a ranger and a paladin, right there, you've got 6 PC's who have a chance of being psionic.</p><p></p><p>Look, I'm not saying EVERY PC was psionic. Of course not. But a group with a single PC with psionics? Yeah, that was pretty common. About as common as a gnome PC. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Call it Monty Haul all you like, it's just math. With that many PC's, plus potentials for additional PC's per player, having a psionic character in our groups wasn't unusual. It's all down to how that table played. </p><p></p><p>Like I said, statements about "How the game was played" basically don't mean anything because the plural of anecdote is not data.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 7855433, member: 22779"] Meh, my point is, there are so many different ways of playing 1e, that saying "This is the way the game was played" is pointless. I mean, even using 4d6-L, with 10 PC's, you get a LOT of PC's with stats above 16. And, let's not forget, AD&D minimum stats for classes. Rangers needed a 15 Cha, so, a 16 isn't unheard of. Druids and clerics needed wisdom. Wizards needed Int. Paladins needed a 17 Cha. So, if you had a group of 10 PC's, with 2 wizards, a cleric, a druid, a ranger and a paladin, right there, you've got 6 PC's who have a chance of being psionic. Look, I'm not saying EVERY PC was psionic. Of course not. But a group with a single PC with psionics? Yeah, that was pretty common. About as common as a gnome PC. :D Call it Monty Haul all you like, it's just math. With that many PC's, plus potentials for additional PC's per player, having a psionic character in our groups wasn't unusual. It's all down to how that table played. Like I said, statements about "How the game was played" basically don't mean anything because the plural of anecdote is not data. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
My biggest gripe with 5e design
Top