Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
My 'Boys were Alive and Kicking - SD is out - GB down - NY for the win!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhimsyTheFae" data-source="post: 3997414" data-attributes="member: 8964"><p>First, is ClashmoreDave your hubby? If so, hi Mr. Kahuna. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Second, I think that I will try to tackle your request.</p><p></p><p>I will start by explaining what the team was punished for:</p><p></p><p><em>The Patriots were fined and are losing their first round draft pick in 2008 (this year) because they were caught taping the Jets' sideline. Specifically, they were pointing the camera at the defensive coaches as they sent signals to the players. They were then pointing the camera at the scoreboard to get the down and distance.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Each team received a notice from the league that it was against the rules to tape the coaches on the sideline, prior to the season starting, so the Patriots had no excuse for not knowing this rule.</em></p><p></p><p>Now I will touch on the punishment:</p><p></p><p><em>The team and coach were both fined. The team has lost it's first round draft pick for the upcoming draft. The team was ordered to hand over all tapes to the NFL Commissioner's office, so that they may review them and decide on a course of action. The NFL Commissioner's office has since reviewed and destroyed the tapes (admittedly, I am not happy that they didn't disclose what they found to the public, but that was their perogative).</em></p><p></p><p>Now I will touch on the nature of defensive signal calling (as well as legal sign stealing), so that I can later explain how the Patriots' actions could have assisted them:</p><p></p><p><em>Teams will often have multiple members of the team/coaching staff send signals in to their defense (these signals are hand signals and such, like in baseball, since the defense does not have a player with a radio in his helmet, like the Quarterback on the offense does). The reason that multiple people send these signals in is because it is not illegal to look at the defensive coaches from the opposing sidelines (it is only illegal to tape). So, in order to confuse anyone who may be watching, they use multiple people, some who send in fake signals. Based on these signals, the defense will position itself prior to the snap and how the defense should act after the snap (coverages, blitzes, stunts, etc.).</em></p><p></p><p>Now I will touch on why it is legal to visually steal signals, but not use surveillance equipment (a.k.a. video recorders):</p><p></p><p><em>Since it would be silly to try to prevent all of the players and staff from looking across the field, there really is no way for the NFL to prevent sign-stealing. This is combated by the teams in a couple ways, including having multiple people sending in fake signals. In practice, it's similar to reading your opponent in poker or counting cards. At worst, it is considered unprofessional and bush-league, at best, it can give your offense a slight advantage. Using video recorders allows you to study the signals and figure out which ones are real and which ones are fake. This could help in the second half, but more likely would be useful the next time the teams play, provided the coaching staff is largely unchanged.</em></p><p></p><p>Now I will touch on how knowing the signals could have helped the Patriots, if they had been doing it in the past (this is widely speculated, but I have no proof):</p><p></p><p><em>If the offensive coaches had a way of know what the coverage would be or if there was likely to be a blitz, they could call a play that would take advantage of said defensive setup. Since a blitz sends at least one extra defender in to rush the passer, it leaves on less defender to guard a pass-receiver, so an offense may call a quick pass play to take advantage of the open spot and get rid of the ball before the blitzer gets to the quarterback (or they could call a max-protect play in order to keep a running back or tight end in to block the extra pass-rusher). Basically, it could provide enough of an edge to help the offense be more effective.</em></p><p></p><p>Now I will touch on why it is fruitless to be too decisive on this issue, from a fan standpoint, whether you are for or against the Patriots:</p><p></p><p><em>We don't know what teams do between games to change their signals. We don't know if the Patriots were able to gain any advantage from this. We don't know if they were even able to decipher enough defensive signals to make a difference. Likewise, if it was helping them, we don't know how long they were doing it and if it had an effect on any of their prior seasons. So, we just have a he said/he said with fans of the Patriots and those who don't like the Patriots going back and forth. This is the reason for the reaction that I got from Kahuna and others when I broght it up. It really has been used as a sour-grapes attack by fans of other teams who want to downplay the Patriots' success this year.</em></p><p></p><p>Finally, I will touch on my personal feelings on this:</p><p></p><p><em>I do think that the Patriots have had one of the, if not the, best season (to this point) of any sport. I also think that it is a low point on the season and will follow the team in some way. It's too bad, because without it, the season truly would have been flawless (to this point). I brought it up because it does make the season less than perfect and leaves the door open for another team in the future to actually have a better year. If the Patriots do win the Super Bowl, I will agree that the 2007 Patriots are the best team and had the best season to date in the history of the NFL. They are also closing in on being one of the, if not the, best dynasty in the history of the NFL. It's pretty scary (or exciting if you're a Patriots fan).</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>I will admit that I really enjoy bringing it up to get under the skin of Patriot fans. I also normally refer to the team as the Cheatriots and the coach as Belicheat. Normally, I am an irrational Packers fan, because it is fun to be irrational and sports talk gives me that outlet. This is a rare moment and I'll try not to be so rational in the future.</em></p><p></p><p>I think that I covered everything that I wanted to cover, so I'll end with this:</p><p></p><p><em>Go Packers!</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Go Operation 18-1 (this would be the Patriots' record if they lose in the Super Bowl, which I hope happens if the Packers are there to play them)!</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhimsyTheFae, post: 3997414, member: 8964"] First, is ClashmoreDave your hubby? If so, hi Mr. Kahuna. :) Second, I think that I will try to tackle your request. I will start by explaining what the team was punished for: [I]The Patriots were fined and are losing their first round draft pick in 2008 (this year) because they were caught taping the Jets' sideline. Specifically, they were pointing the camera at the defensive coaches as they sent signals to the players. They were then pointing the camera at the scoreboard to get the down and distance. Each team received a notice from the league that it was against the rules to tape the coaches on the sideline, prior to the season starting, so the Patriots had no excuse for not knowing this rule.[/I] Now I will touch on the punishment: [I]The team and coach were both fined. The team has lost it's first round draft pick for the upcoming draft. The team was ordered to hand over all tapes to the NFL Commissioner's office, so that they may review them and decide on a course of action. The NFL Commissioner's office has since reviewed and destroyed the tapes (admittedly, I am not happy that they didn't disclose what they found to the public, but that was their perogative).[/I] Now I will touch on the nature of defensive signal calling (as well as legal sign stealing), so that I can later explain how the Patriots' actions could have assisted them: [I]Teams will often have multiple members of the team/coaching staff send signals in to their defense (these signals are hand signals and such, like in baseball, since the defense does not have a player with a radio in his helmet, like the Quarterback on the offense does). The reason that multiple people send these signals in is because it is not illegal to look at the defensive coaches from the opposing sidelines (it is only illegal to tape). So, in order to confuse anyone who may be watching, they use multiple people, some who send in fake signals. Based on these signals, the defense will position itself prior to the snap and how the defense should act after the snap (coverages, blitzes, stunts, etc.).[/I] Now I will touch on why it is legal to visually steal signals, but not use surveillance equipment (a.k.a. video recorders): [I]Since it would be silly to try to prevent all of the players and staff from looking across the field, there really is no way for the NFL to prevent sign-stealing. This is combated by the teams in a couple ways, including having multiple people sending in fake signals. In practice, it's similar to reading your opponent in poker or counting cards. At worst, it is considered unprofessional and bush-league, at best, it can give your offense a slight advantage. Using video recorders allows you to study the signals and figure out which ones are real and which ones are fake. This could help in the second half, but more likely would be useful the next time the teams play, provided the coaching staff is largely unchanged.[/I] Now I will touch on how knowing the signals could have helped the Patriots, if they had been doing it in the past (this is widely speculated, but I have no proof): [I]If the offensive coaches had a way of know what the coverage would be or if there was likely to be a blitz, they could call a play that would take advantage of said defensive setup. Since a blitz sends at least one extra defender in to rush the passer, it leaves on less defender to guard a pass-receiver, so an offense may call a quick pass play to take advantage of the open spot and get rid of the ball before the blitzer gets to the quarterback (or they could call a max-protect play in order to keep a running back or tight end in to block the extra pass-rusher). Basically, it could provide enough of an edge to help the offense be more effective.[/I] Now I will touch on why it is fruitless to be too decisive on this issue, from a fan standpoint, whether you are for or against the Patriots: [I]We don't know what teams do between games to change their signals. We don't know if the Patriots were able to gain any advantage from this. We don't know if they were even able to decipher enough defensive signals to make a difference. Likewise, if it was helping them, we don't know how long they were doing it and if it had an effect on any of their prior seasons. So, we just have a he said/he said with fans of the Patriots and those who don't like the Patriots going back and forth. This is the reason for the reaction that I got from Kahuna and others when I broght it up. It really has been used as a sour-grapes attack by fans of other teams who want to downplay the Patriots' success this year.[/I] Finally, I will touch on my personal feelings on this: [I]I do think that the Patriots have had one of the, if not the, best season (to this point) of any sport. I also think that it is a low point on the season and will follow the team in some way. It's too bad, because without it, the season truly would have been flawless (to this point). I brought it up because it does make the season less than perfect and leaves the door open for another team in the future to actually have a better year. If the Patriots do win the Super Bowl, I will agree that the 2007 Patriots are the best team and had the best season to date in the history of the NFL. They are also closing in on being one of the, if not the, best dynasty in the history of the NFL. It's pretty scary (or exciting if you're a Patriots fan). I will admit that I really enjoy bringing it up to get under the skin of Patriot fans. I also normally refer to the team as the Cheatriots and the coach as Belicheat. Normally, I am an irrational Packers fan, because it is fun to be irrational and sports talk gives me that outlet. This is a rare moment and I'll try not to be so rational in the future.[/I] I think that I covered everything that I wanted to cover, so I'll end with this: [I]Go Packers! Go Operation 18-1 (this would be the Patriots' record if they lose in the Super Bowl, which I hope happens if the Packers are there to play them)![/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
My 'Boys were Alive and Kicking - SD is out - GB down - NY for the win!!!
Top