Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BriarMonkey" data-source="post: 5394987" data-attributes="member: 95387">While the premise looks interesting, it does appear more that you are just shifting from humanocentric to dragonborne-centric and thus shifting traditional monster roles over a notch.&nbsp; And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that (commenting as a DM).However, from a player perspective, it brings to mind the expression &quot;Every DM builds the world he [she] would like to game in.&quot;&nbsp; And I can't say that it is a world I'd want to game in necessarily.&nbsp; I agree largely with Marcq - I personally don't much care for Psionics nor for a highly restricted list of options for what my PC may and may not be.&nbsp; I prefer options.&nbsp; (But you know your group, so hopefully you have discussed this setup and they are happy to play it.)Speaking to the actual write up though, I do think that the length and content address the overall arch that a player would need.&nbsp; It supplies a good amount of information and allows one to get a feel for the campaign.As an aside though, after reading it, I did think what fun it could be to actually play that same set-up with a mixed race group - sort of a situation where a church of the Dragonborne have sent one of their own out into the barbaric lands to &quot;convert&quot; the heathens...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BriarMonkey, post: 5394987, member: 95387"] While the premise looks interesting, it does appear more that you are just shifting from humanocentric to dragonborne-centric and thus shifting traditional monster roles over a notch. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that (commenting as a DM). However, from a player perspective, it brings to mind the expression "Every DM builds the world he [she] would like to game in." And I can't say that it is a world I'd want to game in necessarily. I agree largely with Marcq - I personally don't much care for Psionics nor for a highly restricted list of options for what my PC may and may not be. I prefer options. (But you know your group, so hopefully you have discussed this setup and they are happy to play it.) Speaking to the actual write up though, I do think that the length and content address the overall arch that a player would need. It supplies a good amount of information and allows one to get a feel for the campaign. As an aside though, after reading it, I did think what fun it could be to actually play that same set-up with a mixed race group - sort of a situation where a church of the Dragonborne have sent one of their own out into the barbaric lands to "convert" the heathens... [/QUOTE]

Verification