Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"My Character Is Always..." and related topics.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7315698" data-attributes="member: 6919838"><p>it was an AP and the jaw dropper was that that statement followed a very good section on "if they found out this from that interaction then..." which listed several cases of using info gained along the way and adjusting their ambush encounter ranges, spottting difficulties etc with the knowledge gained in these prior/optional encounters and a baseline presumption of competence.</p><p></p><p>Literally, if they had been told of the group setting up the ambush and had been told likely spots they tend to use, they would get an EASY check at long range to spot the ambush. if they were clueless, they would get a HARD check at much much closer range (within combat range.) This was an assumed granted benefit from having the knowledge, assumed characters used that info.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But if the player stated "looking for ambush" they got advantage on those rolls... </p><p></p><p>So the rules setup the case that "we know there is an ambush force. we know several places we expect them to be. because of this we will be able to get closer before we get noticed." but allows that maybe the characters are not "looking for an ambush" unless the players state it to gain an advantage???</p><p></p><p>it was a jarring disconnect and to me a clash of editions and approaches - one assumes character competence and the other more of a "say you look up" gotcha sort of thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7315698, member: 6919838"] it was an AP and the jaw dropper was that that statement followed a very good section on "if they found out this from that interaction then..." which listed several cases of using info gained along the way and adjusting their ambush encounter ranges, spottting difficulties etc with the knowledge gained in these prior/optional encounters and a baseline presumption of competence. Literally, if they had been told of the group setting up the ambush and had been told likely spots they tend to use, they would get an EASY check at long range to spot the ambush. if they were clueless, they would get a HARD check at much much closer range (within combat range.) This was an assumed granted benefit from having the knowledge, assumed characters used that info. But if the player stated "looking for ambush" they got advantage on those rolls... So the rules setup the case that "we know there is an ambush force. we know several places we expect them to be. because of this we will be able to get closer before we get noticed." but allows that maybe the characters are not "looking for an ambush" unless the players state it to gain an advantage??? it was a jarring disconnect and to me a clash of editions and approaches - one assumes character competence and the other more of a "say you look up" gotcha sort of thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"My Character Is Always..." and related topics.
Top