Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
My crossbows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 405483" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>I like the double and repeating crossbow rules. (I used something similar in the last game I ran--too bad none of the players opted to use them). Your rules for firing both crossbow bolts at the same time are a good deal better than mine were.</p><p></p><p>WRT the proficiencies, however, I don't think it's a good idea either in terms of game balance or the elusive common sense.</p><p></p><p>In game balance terms, proficiencies are selected in terms of balance. The crossbow is a simple weapon usable by all character classes and bows are martial weapons usable primarily by elves and the fighting classes (plus bards). Changing this designation deprives the fighting classes (for whom it is changed) of their most effective ranged weapons in return for weapons which will not be nearly as effective for them (since crossbows don't allow a strength bonus and their ability to make iterative attacks is limited). OTOH, by extending shortbow proficiency to simple, you give more effective weapons to primitive wizards, sorcerors, clerics, and monks. This isn't a huge effect on balance, but I don't think it's a good idea.</p><p></p><p>In terms of common sense, however, is where this breaks down. Although some weapons are martial or exotic as a matter of game balance rather than a matter of simplicity, the crossbow and bow class weapons aren't among them. Crossbows are simple because they were historically simple weapons which required little training. That they would be unfamiliar to primitive cultures wouldn't make them very hard to pick up and use effectively with minimal training. Similarly, although many primitive cultures were widely proficient with bows (although more were widely proficient with spears if I understand my anthropology correctly), that was a matter of constant training and not a matter of the bow's inherent simplicity. Although most Welsh trained with longbows, for instance, a Welsh monk might very well be unable to use a longbow effectively--(because he didn't practice long enough to gain proficiency before entering the monastery).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 405483, member: 3146"] I like the double and repeating crossbow rules. (I used something similar in the last game I ran--too bad none of the players opted to use them). Your rules for firing both crossbow bolts at the same time are a good deal better than mine were. WRT the proficiencies, however, I don't think it's a good idea either in terms of game balance or the elusive common sense. In game balance terms, proficiencies are selected in terms of balance. The crossbow is a simple weapon usable by all character classes and bows are martial weapons usable primarily by elves and the fighting classes (plus bards). Changing this designation deprives the fighting classes (for whom it is changed) of their most effective ranged weapons in return for weapons which will not be nearly as effective for them (since crossbows don't allow a strength bonus and their ability to make iterative attacks is limited). OTOH, by extending shortbow proficiency to simple, you give more effective weapons to primitive wizards, sorcerors, clerics, and monks. This isn't a huge effect on balance, but I don't think it's a good idea. In terms of common sense, however, is where this breaks down. Although some weapons are martial or exotic as a matter of game balance rather than a matter of simplicity, the crossbow and bow class weapons aren't among them. Crossbows are simple because they were historically simple weapons which required little training. That they would be unfamiliar to primitive cultures wouldn't make them very hard to pick up and use effectively with minimal training. Similarly, although many primitive cultures were widely proficient with bows (although more were widely proficient with spears if I understand my anthropology correctly), that was a matter of constant training and not a matter of the bow's inherent simplicity. Although most Welsh trained with longbows, for instance, a Welsh monk might very well be unable to use a longbow effectively--(because he didn't practice long enough to gain proficiency before entering the monastery). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
My crossbows
Top