Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Terwox" data-source="post: 4419718" data-attributes="member: 1044">Treebore:&nbsp; My current experience has been that DM'ing 4E is remarkably easier than 3E.&nbsp; I haven't played C&amp;C, but I've played quite a bit of True20.&nbsp; I find creating and balancing encounters, and creating new monsters, easier to do than in 3E for sure, and somewhat comparable to True20.You may want to give the game a shot on the DM side before shutting the door.&nbsp; Also sounds like you might want to try it at level 11 or 16... I haven't played past 2nd myself, but it seems like the disparity between classes and roles will be a lot more apparent once paragon paths and more encounter/daily powers are taken.But yeah -- if you're totally happy w/ C&amp;C, and it sounds like your family prefers it too, you might not even want to bother.&nbsp; So far I'm enjoying 4E more than True20, though... but I think that may be primarily because I'm DM'ing.&nbsp; I haven't played it yet.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Terwox, post: 4419718, member: 1044"] Treebore: My current experience has been that DM'ing 4E is remarkably easier than 3E. I haven't played C&C, but I've played quite a bit of True20. I find creating and balancing encounters, and creating new monsters, easier to do than in 3E for sure, and somewhat comparable to True20. You may want to give the game a shot on the DM side before shutting the door. Also sounds like you might want to try it at level 11 or 16... I haven't played past 2nd myself, but it seems like the disparity between classes and roles will be a lot more apparent once paragon paths and more encounter/daily powers are taken. But yeah -- if you're totally happy w/ C&C, and it sounds like your family prefers it too, you might not even want to bother. So far I'm enjoying 4E more than True20, though... but I think that may be primarily because I'm DM'ing. I haven't played it yet. [/QUOTE]

Verification