Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bialaska" data-source="post: 4313889" data-attributes="member: 33054">The way I see it, 4e is what they should have made after 2e. 3e should then be the next step in the evolution. With each version of the game it should open more opportunities and versatility to the players, I think, but 4e is a colossal step back from the 3.X. Whether that's good or bad is up for discussion. 4e has a lot of good ideas, but many 3.X players are scared off when they find out that they just can't play the character they want to play.As for roles, I really don't like them. I am one of the players who tend to make characters that cover two or more roles. Might not be as good a striker as a dedicated striker, or as great a fighter as a dedicated defender. But the fact that I can cover where necessary has always been one thing I liked.</blockquote>