Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 3644840" data-attributes="member: 14506">It might be nice to know what books you are allowing in these house rules.I like your skill change. Very simple and elegant. class skills get you +3 other ones get you no +3.Races all look fine.For HD, it might make sense to go 3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9- you are after all using fractional Saves and BAB.Swaping around the casting stat seems fine. However charisma will likely never be selected.Barbarians are fineNo Bard changes?Clerics are more powerfulDruids no big changeFighter is fineMonk- weaker?, can they multi-class freely?Paladin- sure if you like it, turn them into a knight even more than they already are.Ranger- nice change less finiky with their bonusesRogues- sureSorcerer- I like the changes.Wizard- ok.Use magic device- why?All level losses are -2 con? They should be that is what I do in my game however they are not permanent losses.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sadrik, post: 3644840, member: 14506"] It might be nice to know what books you are allowing in these house rules. I like your skill change. Very simple and elegant. class skills get you +3 other ones get you no +3. Races all look fine. For HD, it might make sense to go 3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9- you are after all using fractional Saves and BAB. Swaping around the casting stat seems fine. However charisma will likely never be selected. Barbarians are fine No Bard changes? Clerics are more powerful Druids no big change Fighter is fine Monk- weaker?, can they multi-class freely? Paladin- sure if you like it, turn them into a knight even more than they already are. Ranger- nice change less finiky with their bonuses Rogues- sure Sorcerer- I like the changes. Wizard- ok. Use magic device- why? All level losses are -2 con? They should be that is what I do in my game however they are not permanent losses. [/QUOTE]

Verification