Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RuminDange" data-source="post: 1743444" data-attributes="member: 5412">Well since I said &nbsp; Never was it an indication that I had trouble with the mess that was AD&amp;D 1e and 2e rules.&nbsp; I personally had no trouble with them or the house rules I used to straighten them out to suit my needs or campaign at the time.&nbsp; However, The groups of players I have had during that time have had problems even with the most simple of rules, including 3E.&nbsp; The players sometimes understand one set of rules better than others just depending on their degree of interest and &quot;buy in&quot;.&nbsp; I have players that even get editions mixed up still even today after 3+ years of 3E and then want to argue about it until they've read the stuff again.&nbsp; But since other game system we've used in between AD&amp;D 2E and 3E involved the Attack Roll vs. the Parry Roll type mechanics, which is something they understand a lot more, and have no problem paying for the ability with training.RD</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RuminDange, post: 1743444, member: 5412"] Well since I said Never was it an indication that I had trouble with the mess that was AD&D 1e and 2e rules. I personally had no trouble with them or the house rules I used to straighten them out to suit my needs or campaign at the time. However, The groups of players I have had during that time have had problems even with the most simple of rules, including 3E. The players sometimes understand one set of rules better than others just depending on their degree of interest and "buy in". I have players that even get editions mixed up still even today after 3+ years of 3E and then want to argue about it until they've read the stuff again. But since other game system we've used in between AD&D 2E and 3E involved the Attack Roll vs. the Parry Roll type mechanics, which is something they understand a lot more, and have no problem paying for the ability with training. RD [/QUOTE]

Verification