Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
My piazo problmes Forked Thread: Another Cease and Desist Letter: 4E Powercards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Admiral Caine" data-source="post: 4676178" data-attributes="member: 60438"><p>This is a really good point to reply to... I sincerely appreciate saying that you don't get it. Because it allows me to make a point that I think gets lost in all of this. </p><p> </p><p>(However, just to be clear- what you have in quotation marks above is your interpretation, not Paizo's.)</p><p> </p><p>What you're not understanding is why the PF RPG exists. Why it is being developed. </p><p> </p><p><strong>It exists to enable them to write and publish their Adventure Paths.</strong> </p><p> </p><p>That is an important distinction to make.</p><p> </p><p>Because when 3.0 and 3.5 were published, having a rule set in order to publish supplementary source material wasn't the goal. WOTC wanted to sell core books.</p><p> </p><p>Paizo's strongest revenue stream (to my admittedly limited knowledge) is their Adventure Paths. It is also what garners them the most critical acclaim, and I don't think it would be unfair to say that is what they're best at.</p><p> </p><p>The PF game exists to serve the APs. </p><p>The AP's do not exist to serve the PF game.</p><p> </p><p>You need to understand that relationship, because it's backward to WOTC's original publishing strategy.</p><p> </p><p>Having said that-</p><p>1.) Do they want the game to be great? Yes.</p><p>2.) Would they like to license it to other publishers? Probably yes.</p><p>3.) Would they like to make money from it? Sure.</p><p> </p><p>Selling the APs and making some profit off the core rules doesn't have to be 100% mutually exclusive goals.</p><p> </p><p>However, if Paizo really wanted to make a whole lot of money on the Core Game, they would invent a whole new game and not base it on 3.5. Because that would call for a lot more books to be published. However, they're aiming this for an audience that is happy to buy AP books and who do not want to buy thousands of dollars worth of new core books.</p><p> </p><p>Hope this makes sense.</p><p> </p><p>These are my words and if I'm incorrect then the error is mine. However I base what I've said upon things said by James Jacobs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Admiral Caine, post: 4676178, member: 60438"] This is a really good point to reply to... I sincerely appreciate saying that you don't get it. Because it allows me to make a point that I think gets lost in all of this. (However, just to be clear- what you have in quotation marks above is your interpretation, not Paizo's.) What you're not understanding is why the PF RPG exists. Why it is being developed. [B]It exists to enable them to write and publish their Adventure Paths.[/B] That is an important distinction to make. Because when 3.0 and 3.5 were published, having a rule set in order to publish supplementary source material wasn't the goal. WOTC wanted to sell core books. Paizo's strongest revenue stream (to my admittedly limited knowledge) is their Adventure Paths. It is also what garners them the most critical acclaim, and I don't think it would be unfair to say that is what they're best at. The PF game exists to serve the APs. The AP's do not exist to serve the PF game. You need to understand that relationship, because it's backward to WOTC's original publishing strategy. Having said that- 1.) Do they want the game to be great? Yes. 2.) Would they like to license it to other publishers? Probably yes. 3.) Would they like to make money from it? Sure. Selling the APs and making some profit off the core rules doesn't have to be 100% mutually exclusive goals. However, if Paizo really wanted to make a whole lot of money on the Core Game, they would invent a whole new game and not base it on 3.5. Because that would call for a lot more books to be published. However, they're aiming this for an audience that is happy to buy AP books and who do not want to buy thousands of dollars worth of new core books. Hope this makes sense. These are my words and if I'm incorrect then the error is mine. However I base what I've said upon things said by James Jacobs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
My piazo problmes Forked Thread: Another Cease and Desist Letter: 4E Powercards
Top