Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
My players are going to hate me...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The_Magician" data-source="post: 2641013" data-attributes="member: 14978"><p>Oh, yeah. I really AM assuming the DM didnt make all the necessary rolls for his assassin NPC. Why am I assuming? Because the information isnt in his text. And they way it is written, it gives the impression to me(and I can see to others as well) that the encounter wasn't a fair one. Assuming things is not wrong. I dont have to check my brother's DNA everytime I see him, or get his fingerprints, so I am sure it IS him infront of me. I will just assume that if it looks and smells like my brother, that it is my brother. </p><p></p><p>We all do it all the time, every single day of our lives. There is no such thing as complte information. And there is no such thing as sending a message and having the receiver to fully understand it. It is impossible. So yeah, we have to put pieces together and interpret messages all the time, and they way I interpret the messages in this thread is that teh encounter wasnt fair. I dont care about PCs dying (that's not what people are talking about, here), as I dont care about DMs gloating. The problem lies when the PCs die unfairly and when DMs gloat about using their "powers" unfairly.</p><p></p><p>YOu are damn right the thread only got this reaction because it was the PCs that died, and not an NPC. A PC that died in a way interpreted by many as unfair. And people are not wrong to assume it was unfair. That is how they are reading it and interpreting it. Here is another assumption. I assume the OP glotated about himself in this thread waiting for attention and taps on his back(Oh well, you cant blame people to think differently from you.). Anything wrong with that? Not at all! Heck, I do it all the time. Who doesn't like a little attention? Do I think he is a lousy DM? No, I dont even know him or how he DMs! Do I think he killed that PC unfairly? You bet, baby. And I feel so positive it was unfair that I would have a hard time believing him, if he came to the forums and said he made all the necessary rolls for his assassin.</p><p></p><p>So yeah, defend the scenario if you want, tell people they are wrong, that they are assuming things. It wont change the fact that a lot of people interpreted the situation that way. Myself included. And the world keeps spinning...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The_Magician, post: 2641013, member: 14978"] Oh, yeah. I really AM assuming the DM didnt make all the necessary rolls for his assassin NPC. Why am I assuming? Because the information isnt in his text. And they way it is written, it gives the impression to me(and I can see to others as well) that the encounter wasn't a fair one. Assuming things is not wrong. I dont have to check my brother's DNA everytime I see him, or get his fingerprints, so I am sure it IS him infront of me. I will just assume that if it looks and smells like my brother, that it is my brother. We all do it all the time, every single day of our lives. There is no such thing as complte information. And there is no such thing as sending a message and having the receiver to fully understand it. It is impossible. So yeah, we have to put pieces together and interpret messages all the time, and they way I interpret the messages in this thread is that teh encounter wasnt fair. I dont care about PCs dying (that's not what people are talking about, here), as I dont care about DMs gloating. The problem lies when the PCs die unfairly and when DMs gloat about using their "powers" unfairly. YOu are damn right the thread only got this reaction because it was the PCs that died, and not an NPC. A PC that died in a way interpreted by many as unfair. And people are not wrong to assume it was unfair. That is how they are reading it and interpreting it. Here is another assumption. I assume the OP glotated about himself in this thread waiting for attention and taps on his back(Oh well, you cant blame people to think differently from you.). Anything wrong with that? Not at all! Heck, I do it all the time. Who doesn't like a little attention? Do I think he is a lousy DM? No, I dont even know him or how he DMs! Do I think he killed that PC unfairly? You bet, baby. And I feel so positive it was unfair that I would have a hard time believing him, if he came to the forums and said he made all the necessary rolls for his assassin. So yeah, defend the scenario if you want, tell people they are wrong, that they are assuming things. It wont change the fact that a lot of people interpreted the situation that way. Myself included. And the world keeps spinning... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
My players are going to hate me...
Top