Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
My Quick and Dirty Tasha Read
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NotAYakk" data-source="post: 8137940" data-attributes="member: 72555"><p>Well, the MC rules definitely says the extra attacks granted don't add together.</p><p></p><p>You can read the first sentence as describing the paragraph, the second sentence as describing what "don't add together" means, then the third one clarifying that it works the same way with similar features.</p><p></p><p>Or you can read the first sentence as saying "you pick one extra attack feature to use and ignore the rest", the second sentence as being redundant and meaningless, and the third sentence extending it to similar features.</p><p></p><p>Or you can read it as the rule making clear that the wording "instead of one attack, you can make X" doesn't work if you are already making more than 1 attack. I mean, naively, you could with 1 extra attack feature apply the feature, go from 1 to 2 attacks. Then on the first attack, you apply the feature again, turning that 1 attack into 2 again; so, just as you cannot apply <strong>extra attack</strong> when you already have more than one attack, you can't apply the fighter's version and the ranger's version, because the perquisite (one attack) is no longer holding.</p><p></p><p>Assuming you are a level 17 character: fighter 11/BS 6.</p><p></p><p>Interpretation 1: You can make 2 weapon attacks and cast a cantrip.</p><p>Interpretation 2: You can make either 3 weapon attacks, or 1 weapon attack and cast a cantrip.</p><p>Interpretation 3: Still unclear. Does the "moreover" only apply if you had used the first part of the feature, or does it apply independently?</p><p></p><p>Similar dancing of wording applies to the haste attack action. Does it mean "you cannot make more than one attack as part of the attack action" or does it mean "you can do nothing else in the attack action except make one attack" or "you can do whatever you want in the attack action, so long as the result is exactly one attack". Those are all reasonable readings of the haste attack action restriction, and they result in subtle differences in how it interacts with the bladesinger ability (on top of if how you connect moreover to the rest of the bladesinger extra attack feature).</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>Myself, a Fighter 11/BS 6 is free to make 2 attacks and a cantrip as part of the attack action. It is T3 and you built your character for just this trick. Have fun. I don't see a serious balance hit here, nor is the wording so tortorous I'd recoil.</p><p></p><p>I'd also say that Haste is "the only thing you can do is one single attack in the attack action", which bars making a cantrip attack in the hasted action. Haste is already pretty darn strong, it doesn't need the boost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NotAYakk, post: 8137940, member: 72555"] Well, the MC rules definitely says the extra attacks granted don't add together. You can read the first sentence as describing the paragraph, the second sentence as describing what "don't add together" means, then the third one clarifying that it works the same way with similar features. Or you can read the first sentence as saying "you pick one extra attack feature to use and ignore the rest", the second sentence as being redundant and meaningless, and the third sentence extending it to similar features. Or you can read it as the rule making clear that the wording "instead of one attack, you can make X" doesn't work if you are already making more than 1 attack. I mean, naively, you could with 1 extra attack feature apply the feature, go from 1 to 2 attacks. Then on the first attack, you apply the feature again, turning that 1 attack into 2 again; so, just as you cannot apply [b]extra attack[/b] when you already have more than one attack, you can't apply the fighter's version and the ranger's version, because the perquisite (one attack) is no longer holding. Assuming you are a level 17 character: fighter 11/BS 6. Interpretation 1: You can make 2 weapon attacks and cast a cantrip. Interpretation 2: You can make either 3 weapon attacks, or 1 weapon attack and cast a cantrip. Interpretation 3: Still unclear. Does the "moreover" only apply if you had used the first part of the feature, or does it apply independently? Similar dancing of wording applies to the haste attack action. Does it mean "you cannot make more than one attack as part of the attack action" or does it mean "you can do nothing else in the attack action except make one attack" or "you can do whatever you want in the attack action, so long as the result is exactly one attack". Those are all reasonable readings of the haste attack action restriction, and they result in subtle differences in how it interacts with the bladesinger ability (on top of if how you connect moreover to the rest of the bladesinger extra attack feature). --- Myself, a Fighter 11/BS 6 is free to make 2 attacks and a cantrip as part of the attack action. It is T3 and you built your character for just this trick. Have fun. I don't see a serious balance hit here, nor is the wording so tortorous I'd recoil. I'd also say that Haste is "the only thing you can do is one single attack in the attack action", which bars making a cantrip attack in the hasted action. Haste is already pretty darn strong, it doesn't need the boost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
My Quick and Dirty Tasha Read
Top