Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
My Review of 13th Age
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Balesir" data-source="post: 6167704" data-attributes="member: 27160"><p>Sorry for the "pregnant pause" - technical glitch...</p><p>No, I don't think you're misunderstanding, but you are maybe seeing only a part of the picture.</p><p></p><p>If the above scenario happens, the players may, indeed, have discovered something about the world - that there are poison traps, and they kill! But the chances are good, in my experience, that this will not be new knowledge - it will already be known (or, in poor cases, merely assumed) by those playing. Often, they will be somehow implicit or explicit in the text of the rules. As with exploring the real universe, things can usually only be discovered once - at least by any one group of people - because the second and subsequent times they go there we don't call it "exploration" or "discovery".</p><p></p><p>Since game worlds are not real but imaginary, any "discovery" is actually "building". Thus, if the GM has decided/discovered/built something in advance, sharing it is not "building" since it's not "discovery" (the discovery had already been made). Likewise, if the player decides some "unique thing" or background for their character, it's "built" as soon as their decision is accepted into the world model - the timing of which relies on the authority allocation parts of the game rules. In 13th Age this is not 100% clear; do the players have <em>carte blanche</em>, or does the GM "vet" every element, and it only becomes "real" in the game world when the GM agrees? For me, it's <em>carte blanche</em>, and that's the basis on which I like 13th Age, but the rules text allow it to play either way.</p><p></p><p>When the player-defined elements of OUT and background come into contact with the GM's world elements, that is when in-play discoveries that are guided by both GM and player can arise. The role I see Icon relationships playing in this is to constrain the GM to actually include situations where those OUTs and backgrounds are going to come into focus, so that joint discovery about what they mean is possible. That's all. It's not a big deal, in the greater scheme of things, but it means that the player's desires concerning what aspects of the universe they want to prod and poke at to see what comes out have mechanical support (and, perhaps more to the point, mechanical memory prods) that the GM is directed to use.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Balesir, post: 6167704, member: 27160"] Sorry for the "pregnant pause" - technical glitch... No, I don't think you're misunderstanding, but you are maybe seeing only a part of the picture. If the above scenario happens, the players may, indeed, have discovered something about the world - that there are poison traps, and they kill! But the chances are good, in my experience, that this will not be new knowledge - it will already be known (or, in poor cases, merely assumed) by those playing. Often, they will be somehow implicit or explicit in the text of the rules. As with exploring the real universe, things can usually only be discovered once - at least by any one group of people - because the second and subsequent times they go there we don't call it "exploration" or "discovery". Since game worlds are not real but imaginary, any "discovery" is actually "building". Thus, if the GM has decided/discovered/built something in advance, sharing it is not "building" since it's not "discovery" (the discovery had already been made). Likewise, if the player decides some "unique thing" or background for their character, it's "built" as soon as their decision is accepted into the world model - the timing of which relies on the authority allocation parts of the game rules. In 13th Age this is not 100% clear; do the players have [I]carte blanche[/I], or does the GM "vet" every element, and it only becomes "real" in the game world when the GM agrees? For me, it's [I]carte blanche[/I], and that's the basis on which I like 13th Age, but the rules text allow it to play either way. When the player-defined elements of OUT and background come into contact with the GM's world elements, that is when in-play discoveries that are guided by both GM and player can arise. The role I see Icon relationships playing in this is to constrain the GM to actually include situations where those OUTs and backgrounds are going to come into focus, so that joint discovery about what they mean is possible. That's all. It's not a big deal, in the greater scheme of things, but it means that the player's desires concerning what aspects of the universe they want to prod and poke at to see what comes out have mechanical support (and, perhaps more to the point, mechanical memory prods) that the GM is directed to use. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
My Review of 13th Age
Top