Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 7045607" data-attributes="member: 6701872">The hut doesn't allow things in or out based on who is holding it; the only check to determine if something can pass through the hut freely is whether it is a creature or object that was within the dome when the spell was cast - and that doesn't change no matter how many times a creature or object goes out and then back in.So, any thrown weapon can certainly be thrown back, though I doubt the players are likely to throw anything out of the hut after the first time an enemy throws something back in.Ammunition is a bit trickier. Not because it has a different check to determine if it can pass back into the hut or not, but because it's usability might be in question after it has been fired out of the hut. At my table, we don't track mundane ammunition at all, so there'd be no reason why the baddies outside the hut can't fire ammunition pulled from their own wounds or picked up off the ground back into the hut - but at another table ammunition that gets fired out might be less certainly usable. I think the default 5e rules would suggest that only half the ammo that gets fired one way could be reused to fire the other way, since you can only normally recover half your spent ammunition after an encounter.Absolutely. I'm not in disagreement that the hut is very good at doing what it does (which is permit safe rest in a wide variety of otherwise unsafe scenarios), just saying characters inside it are "nearly invulnerable" rather than "invulnerable."</blockquote>

Verification