Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
My thoughts on Replacing LA: The Minotaur!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sylrae" data-source="post: 4951178" data-attributes="member: 48520"><p>The concept of a base race is that you're MAKING a 0HD, 0 LA Race. And then all of the other racial abilities are gained over the racial levels.</p><p></p><p>The Idea is you put as many of the most important traits to make it as what it is as possible in the Base race, and drop the rest into the levels. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmm. That is a pretty logical way of looking at it. and that makes a great deal of sense if youre assuming that you started out as a fairly average minotaur. The Idea of breaking it down into levels and a base class, allow you to make minotaurs who are not average. They could be the same CR as a regular minotaur, but have developed some different skills. Maybe instead of 6 levels of minotaur, they are CR 8, and have 4 levels of barbarian. Such a creature would still make a pretty good minotaur, and they would make a good leader Minotaur Boss or NPC that players could have to face. It also allows for a player to make a minotaur who is not ever average. But on the other hand, they could still make said average minotaur. AND! If a DM doesn't want to allow the non-typical option (like you wouldn't), you can easily say "Players have to take all monster levels first", "Players have to take all the monster levels before reaching 1.5x the total of the monster levels" or "Players have to take x(or x%) of the monster levels first", or some other variant thereof. In fact, in a package of monsters like this (like a miniature monster manual or something), I'd say it should include all of these as alternate ways to run allowing monster PCs.</p><p></p><p>Also, it should be noted, that since all of the monster levels I came up with should be statted to about the same CR as eachother (I'm going to recalculate it after I calculate the CR of Pathfinder Base Classes), the levels shouldn't have to be taken in any particular order in terms of abilities.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sylrae, post: 4951178, member: 48520"] The concept of a base race is that you're MAKING a 0HD, 0 LA Race. And then all of the other racial abilities are gained over the racial levels. The Idea is you put as many of the most important traits to make it as what it is as possible in the Base race, and drop the rest into the levels. Hmm. That is a pretty logical way of looking at it. and that makes a great deal of sense if youre assuming that you started out as a fairly average minotaur. The Idea of breaking it down into levels and a base class, allow you to make minotaurs who are not average. They could be the same CR as a regular minotaur, but have developed some different skills. Maybe instead of 6 levels of minotaur, they are CR 8, and have 4 levels of barbarian. Such a creature would still make a pretty good minotaur, and they would make a good leader Minotaur Boss or NPC that players could have to face. It also allows for a player to make a minotaur who is not ever average. But on the other hand, they could still make said average minotaur. AND! If a DM doesn't want to allow the non-typical option (like you wouldn't), you can easily say "Players have to take all monster levels first", "Players have to take all the monster levels before reaching 1.5x the total of the monster levels" or "Players have to take x(or x%) of the monster levels first", or some other variant thereof. In fact, in a package of monsters like this (like a miniature monster manual or something), I'd say it should include all of these as alternate ways to run allowing monster PCs. Also, it should be noted, that since all of the monster levels I came up with should be statted to about the same CR as eachother (I'm going to recalculate it after I calculate the CR of Pathfinder Base Classes), the levels shouldn't have to be taken in any particular order in terms of abilities. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
My thoughts on Replacing LA: The Minotaur!
Top