Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Myers-Briggs and Gamers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DreadPirateMurphy" data-source="post: 2883954" data-attributes="member: 20715"><p>Keep in mind the following about M-B:</p><p></p><p>1) Longer questionaires are likely better than shorter for accuracy.</p><p>2) Though expressed as an either-or, it really is a continuum, ranging from a slight to extreme tendency one way or the other.</p><p>3) The results are meant to be informative, not definitive or prescriptive. They are also not meant to justify or explain specific behavior.</p><p>4) Many folks don't need to take a test to figure out their types.</p><p></p><p>The last point just illustrates that these are broad categories, and the 2nd provides for variation. I'm only slightly introverted, but I rate strongly toward intuition, thinking, and judging. That matches my behavior very well. Examples:</p><p></p><p>Two hours into a party, extroverts are ready to go find another party. Introverts want to go home and go to bed. I fall into the second category. Socializing with strangers is exhausting to me...but socializing with friends and family is not, and I have no problems with professional social interactions. That strikes me as a slight introvert tendency.</p><p></p><p>Sensers are interested in past experience, working through a problem, and looking at the facts. Intuitives are much more about inspiration, seeing the big picture, and picking out patterns. Part of my job is to pick out market trends, improve faulty processes, and generally analyze patterns, and it is the part that I enjoy. I also always see tons of options, which is a strongly intuitive behavior trait. Facts by themselves bore me.</p><p></p><p>The thinking vs. feeling aspect has to do with reason vs. emotion, and I am strongly on the reason side -- scientific method, evidence, etc. I don't vote based on who I "like," but on who I think will do the best (or least bad) job based on what I know about them. I think people should be held responsible when they break the rules. I believe in being fair, but not for cutting people slack just to be nice.</p><p></p><p>I am heavily into the judging side of things. I like schedules...I subconsciously plan what I'm going to do, and I can even get annoyed if somebody (usually a "P" type) interrupts my internal schedule with some tangent. I break down problems into organized steps and chunks to guide my work. Being a "J" is how I can be an "N" and still get things done.</p><p></p><p>The point to all this is that I believe the M-B types have utility in understanding people, even if they are not completely comprehensive. M-B doesn't touch on things like individual belief systems, nature vs. nurture arguments, or sociocultural factors, of course, but it does provide reasonably accurate guidelines for behavior in a general sense.</p><p></p><p>Even stress reactions are somewhat predictable. For example, my type (INTJ) reacts to stress by either endulging in sensory activities (watching TV, overeating) or fixating on structured tasks such as organizing shelves, etc. Without going into detail, that is pretty accurate for me -- which I would expect given that I strongly fit 3 of the 4 archtypes for INTJs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DreadPirateMurphy, post: 2883954, member: 20715"] Keep in mind the following about M-B: 1) Longer questionaires are likely better than shorter for accuracy. 2) Though expressed as an either-or, it really is a continuum, ranging from a slight to extreme tendency one way or the other. 3) The results are meant to be informative, not definitive or prescriptive. They are also not meant to justify or explain specific behavior. 4) Many folks don't need to take a test to figure out their types. The last point just illustrates that these are broad categories, and the 2nd provides for variation. I'm only slightly introverted, but I rate strongly toward intuition, thinking, and judging. That matches my behavior very well. Examples: Two hours into a party, extroverts are ready to go find another party. Introverts want to go home and go to bed. I fall into the second category. Socializing with strangers is exhausting to me...but socializing with friends and family is not, and I have no problems with professional social interactions. That strikes me as a slight introvert tendency. Sensers are interested in past experience, working through a problem, and looking at the facts. Intuitives are much more about inspiration, seeing the big picture, and picking out patterns. Part of my job is to pick out market trends, improve faulty processes, and generally analyze patterns, and it is the part that I enjoy. I also always see tons of options, which is a strongly intuitive behavior trait. Facts by themselves bore me. The thinking vs. feeling aspect has to do with reason vs. emotion, and I am strongly on the reason side -- scientific method, evidence, etc. I don't vote based on who I "like," but on who I think will do the best (or least bad) job based on what I know about them. I think people should be held responsible when they break the rules. I believe in being fair, but not for cutting people slack just to be nice. I am heavily into the judging side of things. I like schedules...I subconsciously plan what I'm going to do, and I can even get annoyed if somebody (usually a "P" type) interrupts my internal schedule with some tangent. I break down problems into organized steps and chunks to guide my work. Being a "J" is how I can be an "N" and still get things done. The point to all this is that I believe the M-B types have utility in understanding people, even if they are not completely comprehensive. M-B doesn't touch on things like individual belief systems, nature vs. nurture arguments, or sociocultural factors, of course, but it does provide reasonably accurate guidelines for behavior in a general sense. Even stress reactions are somewhat predictable. For example, my type (INTJ) reacts to stress by either endulging in sensory activities (watching TV, overeating) or fixating on structured tasks such as organizing shelves, etc. Without going into detail, that is pretty accurate for me -- which I would expect given that I strongly fit 3 of the 4 archtypes for INTJs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Myers-Briggs and Gamers
Top