Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 2502211" data-attributes="member: 478">The important thing is, that the feat is clearly not meant to work that way.Besides, the feat is highly optional. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />But yeah, the explanation why it doesn't work is a cheap cop-out... they should just have admitted that it is badly written (well, they did do that, actually, IIRC) and then changed the text of the feat to accomodate.About the question, whether it makes the MT too powerful... at lower levels definitely not, they need all the help they can get there. But at higher levels (we currently have a newly created MT at 14th level in our party, so I can now also see in practice how the theory works out <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />), they probably are quite decent already, and then it would be too much to add the two extra levels of spellcasting ability.ByeThanee</blockquote>