Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Nanotechnology- How the hey am I supposed to talk for 40 min?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tarchon" data-source="post: 1736602" data-attributes="member: 5990"><p>Star Trek: the Next Generation regularly squeezed nanotechnology for juice. "Nanites" came up a lot, and the Borg used "nanoprobes" pretty extensively in all the later series.</p><p>A lot of what makes it into the popular media about nanotechnology is either complete sci fi or is fairly conventional microtechnology that replaces "micro" with "nano" in order to get media attention (and funding). I did my PhD in nanoparticle detection, and I saw that quite a bit. Our usual criterion for nanotech was to have design dimensions (CDs, for the semi folks) less than about 30 nm to seriously qualify as "nanoscale" (32 is roughly the square root of 1000, halfway between a micrometer and nanometer on a log scale - basically that's the decimal logarithmic rounding rule), though you can get by with 100 nm with a lot of hemming and hawing. If you can demonstrate unusual scale-related quantum effects in the system, like with surface plasmon resonance, or reduced dimensionality, you get some nanocredibility, since that's really one of the key physical differences.</p><p></p><p>More amusingly, in aerospace circles, it's common to refer to objects the size of a soda can as "nanosatellites." </p><p>Just get the latest issues of Analog or Isaac Asimov's Sci Fi and see what they're doing with it.</p><p></p><p>One common misconception I've noticed is that people (at least Trek writers) tend to think of nanotechnology as being the same thing as self-replicating technology, which it isn't. I really have a pretty hard time conceiving of independent self-replicating systems much smaller than 100 nm, and even nature hasn't been able to get below about 50 nm, if you exclude viruses, which need to use other organisms to reproduce. I guess if you have carefully controlled environments, you can definitely get nanoscale self-organization (like micelles, for example) but little critters that go out and take over the Enterprise are probably at least in the micron range, even if a lot of their guts are nanoscale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tarchon, post: 1736602, member: 5990"] Star Trek: the Next Generation regularly squeezed nanotechnology for juice. "Nanites" came up a lot, and the Borg used "nanoprobes" pretty extensively in all the later series. A lot of what makes it into the popular media about nanotechnology is either complete sci fi or is fairly conventional microtechnology that replaces "micro" with "nano" in order to get media attention (and funding). I did my PhD in nanoparticle detection, and I saw that quite a bit. Our usual criterion for nanotech was to have design dimensions (CDs, for the semi folks) less than about 30 nm to seriously qualify as "nanoscale" (32 is roughly the square root of 1000, halfway between a micrometer and nanometer on a log scale - basically that's the decimal logarithmic rounding rule), though you can get by with 100 nm with a lot of hemming and hawing. If you can demonstrate unusual scale-related quantum effects in the system, like with surface plasmon resonance, or reduced dimensionality, you get some nanocredibility, since that's really one of the key physical differences. More amusingly, in aerospace circles, it's common to refer to objects the size of a soda can as "nanosatellites." Just get the latest issues of Analog or Isaac Asimov's Sci Fi and see what they're doing with it. One common misconception I've noticed is that people (at least Trek writers) tend to think of nanotechnology as being the same thing as self-replicating technology, which it isn't. I really have a pretty hard time conceiving of independent self-replicating systems much smaller than 100 nm, and even nature hasn't been able to get below about 50 nm, if you exclude viruses, which need to use other organisms to reproduce. I guess if you have carefully controlled environments, you can definitely get nanoscale self-organization (like micelles, for example) but little critters that go out and take over the Enterprise are probably at least in the micron range, even if a lot of their guts are nanoscale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Nanotechnology- How the hey am I supposed to talk for 40 min?
Top