Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6149176" data-attributes="member: 177">Because while a few players may want to choose solely based on style of narrative options, I suspect for most players character choice is a multi-dimensional thing.&nbsp; Where it sits on the style of narrative options is one variable.&nbsp; The fluff, style, power source (the flavor of how it delivers its options - the flavor) also matters.&nbsp; In a perfect world, we'd have each class able to cover all the breadth of narrative options - you could have a fighter that with a laser-focus on fights, sacrificing all else, and you could have a fighter who was still primarily there to be a sword-arm, but also had some other options in social or other realms.&nbsp; Interestingly, clerics and wizards to tend to have more flexibility - you can create a utilitarian wizard, or a combat-focused one, largely depending on your spell choice.&nbsp; We don't have that same flexibility among the warriors.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6149176, member: 177"] Because while a few players may want to choose solely based on style of narrative options, I suspect for most players character choice is a multi-dimensional thing. Where it sits on the style of narrative options is one variable. The fluff, style, power source (the flavor of how it delivers its options - the flavor) also matters. In a perfect world, we'd have each class able to cover all the breadth of narrative options - you could have a fighter that with a laser-focus on fights, sacrificing all else, and you could have a fighter who was still primarily there to be a sword-arm, but also had some other options in social or other realms. Interestingly, clerics and wizards to tend to have more flexibility - you can create a utilitarian wizard, or a combat-focused one, largely depending on your spell choice. We don't have that same flexibility among the warriors. [/QUOTE]

Verification