Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Narrativist" 9-point alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 6619234" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>The AD&D nine-point alignment system seems like it was a bit of a work-in-progress, at least as it was presented across the three core volumes. The Monster Manual seems to have been written with the five-point system that EGG presented in SR #6. Notice that the intermediate alignments, NG, NE, LN, and CN, are not present in any of the monster descriptions. Nine-point alignment showed up in the Players Handbook, but seems to lack the maturity of the description in the DMG, at least that's the one I prefer.</p><p></p><p>Based on the DMG, my take on alignment differs slightly from the nuanced reading you've presented above. My understanding is that all creatures essentially want what's "good" for themselves and, possibly, also for a group of associated creatures to which they conceive themselves as belonging. They want to prosper and have a degree of what we'd call "well-being" or "success". With that assumption in mind, the two axes can be defined as follows:</p><p></p><p>Law-Chaos is about group identification or the lack thereof. Chaotic individuals are self-interested and seek benefit for themselves above all else. If they belong to a group, they maintain a certain amount of independence from it, seeing to their own interests first. Lawful individuals, on the other hand, seek to promote the well-being of the group as a whole, gaining benefit thereby as part of the group, and in extreme cases making personal sacrifices to benefit the group.</p><p></p><p>Good-Evil has to do with belief in the rights of other individuals and groups. Good creatures will uphold the rights of others, sometimes at cost to themselves, while those who are Evil won't let those rights get in the way of getting what they want. I think this narrower definition of Good moves the alignment system away from being prescriptive, or judgmental, of any particular outlook, and towards being descriptive of a creature's actual behavior.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 6619234, member: 6787503"] The AD&D nine-point alignment system seems like it was a bit of a work-in-progress, at least as it was presented across the three core volumes. The Monster Manual seems to have been written with the five-point system that EGG presented in SR #6. Notice that the intermediate alignments, NG, NE, LN, and CN, are not present in any of the monster descriptions. Nine-point alignment showed up in the Players Handbook, but seems to lack the maturity of the description in the DMG, at least that's the one I prefer. Based on the DMG, my take on alignment differs slightly from the nuanced reading you've presented above. My understanding is that all creatures essentially want what's "good" for themselves and, possibly, also for a group of associated creatures to which they conceive themselves as belonging. They want to prosper and have a degree of what we'd call "well-being" or "success". With that assumption in mind, the two axes can be defined as follows: Law-Chaos is about group identification or the lack thereof. Chaotic individuals are self-interested and seek benefit for themselves above all else. If they belong to a group, they maintain a certain amount of independence from it, seeing to their own interests first. Lawful individuals, on the other hand, seek to promote the well-being of the group as a whole, gaining benefit thereby as part of the group, and in extreme cases making personal sacrifices to benefit the group. Good-Evil has to do with belief in the rights of other individuals and groups. Good creatures will uphold the rights of others, sometimes at cost to themselves, while those who are Evil won't let those rights get in the way of getting what they want. I think this narrower definition of Good moves the alignment system away from being prescriptive, or judgmental, of any particular outlook, and towards being descriptive of a creature's actual behavior. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Narrativist" 9-point alignment
Top