Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Narrativist" 9-point alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spinozajack" data-source="post: 6634447" data-attributes="member: 6794198"><p>Alignment is completely irrelevant in 5th edition anyway. Arguing about it is completely pointless, there isn't a single rule that uses it. I'll avoid such threads in the future.</p><p></p><p>I do think the ignore feature on Enworld is broken given that you still get notifications from ignored persons. That does not conform to the expectation as to what an "ignore" feature should do, to any reasonable degree. I do apologize to pemerton for posting in "his" thread and then lambasting him for responding to something I wrote. Still think it's absurd why anyone would do that, but whatever.</p><p></p><p> @<em><strong><u><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=1" target="_blank">Morrus</a></u></strong></em>, how about it, can you talk to your web scripters to filter out activity, mentions, quotes, from those on your ignore list so that is actually works properly? That's a bug.</p><p></p><p>A two-way ignore feature would be far better. It's the norm on virtually all social media, as Umbran correctly mentions. Why should Enworld be any different? On virtually every single other media, aside from D&D websites apparently, it is the norm that when you block someone they can no longer see what you write either. That is a proper ignore feature. I don't want to control anyone, I just want to choose who I converse with. That is my prerogative. A two-sided ignore would prevent many arguments. One wonders why D&D sites are so anti "two way ignore". It solves many problems. Many people on this site mention having blocked other users, it cannot be considered an insult only when I do it. I can name at least three other times in recent memory where I've seen people state they are adding or removing someone from a block. Seems to be accepted behavior here. I expect to be treated like anyone else. If someone says they ignore me, good, I'm happy for them. It's probably mutual anyway. One-sided ignore simply does not work, it's just the equivalent of blocking your ears when someone's talking to you, or putting a one way mirror with yourself in the interrogation room. The ignoree has full sight to keep the debate going.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spinozajack, post: 6634447, member: 6794198"] Alignment is completely irrelevant in 5th edition anyway. Arguing about it is completely pointless, there isn't a single rule that uses it. I'll avoid such threads in the future. I do think the ignore feature on Enworld is broken given that you still get notifications from ignored persons. That does not conform to the expectation as to what an "ignore" feature should do, to any reasonable degree. I do apologize to pemerton for posting in "his" thread and then lambasting him for responding to something I wrote. Still think it's absurd why anyone would do that, but whatever. @[I][B][U][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=1"]Morrus[/URL][/U][/B][/I], how about it, can you talk to your web scripters to filter out activity, mentions, quotes, from those on your ignore list so that is actually works properly? That's a bug. A two-way ignore feature would be far better. It's the norm on virtually all social media, as Umbran correctly mentions. Why should Enworld be any different? On virtually every single other media, aside from D&D websites apparently, it is the norm that when you block someone they can no longer see what you write either. That is a proper ignore feature. I don't want to control anyone, I just want to choose who I converse with. That is my prerogative. A two-sided ignore would prevent many arguments. One wonders why D&D sites are so anti "two way ignore". It solves many problems. Many people on this site mention having blocked other users, it cannot be considered an insult only when I do it. I can name at least three other times in recent memory where I've seen people state they are adding or removing someone from a block. Seems to be accepted behavior here. I expect to be treated like anyone else. If someone says they ignore me, good, I'm happy for them. It's probably mutual anyway. One-sided ignore simply does not work, it's just the equivalent of blocking your ears when someone's talking to you, or putting a one way mirror with yourself in the interrogation room. The ignoree has full sight to keep the debate going. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Narrativist" 9-point alignment
Top