Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Narrativist" 9-point alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 6635411" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Uh huh...ever the moderate you are <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Cortex+ assumes ~ 3 – 7 dice per pool. Smallville doesn’t have MHRP’s Affiliations (Solo, Buddy, Team) which constantly add 1 die per pool. So in their stead you have 6 Values (there are some other PC build difference subtleties but that is primary). Given their less broad applicability (compared to Affiliations), I would guess the number 6 was chosen by the designers such that, despite the nature of the conflict, you pretty much ensure that you’re going to get your 1 “stuff that matters to me” die in your action/reaction pool. You can certainly pare it back to 5, 4 or even 3 if you’d like. However, you're then narrowing the scope of stuff you’re invested in such that you may find a stray conflict here and there where you lose a die in a pool now and again, affecting the maths. Simultaneously, you aren’t invested in the conflict from a value perspective…which is basically the point of play! Personally, while I'm a big fan of thematic tightness, I like the idea of 6 values assuming each of them are clear and have punch (such that I can find compelling, antagonistic satellite conflicts to place in their orbit).</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><p>Regarding die size, they need to be stepped for two reasons: </p><p></p><p>1) That die size has meaning to your character. The higher the die size, the more emotionally invested, the more capable, the more willing you are to stand your ground, fight for what you believe in, and come up with the goods.</p><p></p><p>2) A lower die size indicates a conflicted, strife-ridden value that will inevitably get you into trouble/trigger more opportunities for complications (rolls of 1 in dice pool), feeding into the plot point economy.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><p>The Heroic Fantasy Hack is shaped up a little bit differently than Smallville. It hews pretty much to the MHRP PC build model except trade Affiliation for Backgrounds (basically Race or something equivalent) and trade Power Sets for Class Power Sets. There is nothing here uniformly across PCs for Values/Alignment. You can do one of three things:</p><p></p><p>A) Sub the 3 Distinctions for Values outright. However, per normal rules, you're looking at a d8 or a d4 + 1 PP rewarded for their use. As such, you have no "Value hierarchy" which causes emotional impact, tension, and varying stakes depending on what kind of conflict you're involved in (due to the die size/your committment and the propensity for <em>n </em>Value to complicate your life factor being muted). Further, unless you pick 3 core setting values for your L vs C premise you're wanting the game to be primarily about (eg Authority, Duty, Individuality), you're not going to have symmetrical investment across the PCs.</p><p></p><p>B) Grab Values as above, assume 1 extra dice per pool and typically just throw an extra die into bad guy pools.</p><p></p><p>C) Mix Values into the Specialty (eg Melee Combat, Diplomacy) Pool (you choose 1 at Master and 3 at Expert).</p><p></p><p>D) Rely on individual Quest Milestones to do the heavy lifting of C vs L.</p><p></p><p>Of all those prospective routes, I'd go with B. You really need Distinctions and Specialties to fill out personal build stuff that makes your character unique. Quest Milestones will formally have you pushing play toward you achieving a thematic goal, but it doesn't have the "Value Hierarchy/Prioritization" angle, the "this matters to me so much that I will always pull out all the stops" angle, and the "this kind of stuff usually gets me into trouble" angle.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, I'm running this for my home game right now. It is awesome.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><p>Finally, how would I go about using this in d20? Well, 5e kinda sorta can do it with Inspiration and Bonds, Flaws, Ideals, Traits...but it doesn't have the prioritization, etc angle working for it. And I'm not a huge fan of the GM fiat "here is a token for good roleplaying rather than accepting this complication" deal. With 4e? I would probably go with some kind of "here is a token you can cash in in the future for an Advantage in an SC or a No Action Recharge 5, 6 roll for an Encounter Power...but I'm going to complicate your life with <em>+n</em> encounter budget for this combat or 1 more Hard DC in this SC...deal?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 6635411, member: 6696971"] Uh huh...ever the moderate you are :p Cortex+ assumes ~ 3 – 7 dice per pool. Smallville doesn’t have MHRP’s Affiliations (Solo, Buddy, Team) which constantly add 1 die per pool. So in their stead you have 6 Values (there are some other PC build difference subtleties but that is primary). Given their less broad applicability (compared to Affiliations), I would guess the number 6 was chosen by the designers such that, despite the nature of the conflict, you pretty much ensure that you’re going to get your 1 “stuff that matters to me” die in your action/reaction pool. You can certainly pare it back to 5, 4 or even 3 if you’d like. However, you're then narrowing the scope of stuff you’re invested in such that you may find a stray conflict here and there where you lose a die in a pool now and again, affecting the maths. Simultaneously, you aren’t invested in the conflict from a value perspective…which is basically the point of play! Personally, while I'm a big fan of thematic tightness, I like the idea of 6 values assuming each of them are clear and have punch (such that I can find compelling, antagonistic satellite conflicts to place in their orbit). [HR][/HR] Regarding die size, they need to be stepped for two reasons: 1) That die size has meaning to your character. The higher the die size, the more emotionally invested, the more capable, the more willing you are to stand your ground, fight for what you believe in, and come up with the goods. 2) A lower die size indicates a conflicted, strife-ridden value that will inevitably get you into trouble/trigger more opportunities for complications (rolls of 1 in dice pool), feeding into the plot point economy. [HR][/HR] The Heroic Fantasy Hack is shaped up a little bit differently than Smallville. It hews pretty much to the MHRP PC build model except trade Affiliation for Backgrounds (basically Race or something equivalent) and trade Power Sets for Class Power Sets. There is nothing here uniformly across PCs for Values/Alignment. You can do one of three things: A) Sub the 3 Distinctions for Values outright. However, per normal rules, you're looking at a d8 or a d4 + 1 PP rewarded for their use. As such, you have no "Value hierarchy" which causes emotional impact, tension, and varying stakes depending on what kind of conflict you're involved in (due to the die size/your committment and the propensity for [I]n [/I]Value to complicate your life factor being muted). Further, unless you pick 3 core setting values for your L vs C premise you're wanting the game to be primarily about (eg Authority, Duty, Individuality), you're not going to have symmetrical investment across the PCs. B) Grab Values as above, assume 1 extra dice per pool and typically just throw an extra die into bad guy pools. C) Mix Values into the Specialty (eg Melee Combat, Diplomacy) Pool (you choose 1 at Master and 3 at Expert). D) Rely on individual Quest Milestones to do the heavy lifting of C vs L. Of all those prospective routes, I'd go with B. You really need Distinctions and Specialties to fill out personal build stuff that makes your character unique. Quest Milestones will formally have you pushing play toward you achieving a thematic goal, but it doesn't have the "Value Hierarchy/Prioritization" angle, the "this matters to me so much that I will always pull out all the stops" angle, and the "this kind of stuff usually gets me into trouble" angle. As an aside, I'm running this for my home game right now. It is awesome. [HR][/HR] Finally, how would I go about using this in d20? Well, 5e kinda sorta can do it with Inspiration and Bonds, Flaws, Ideals, Traits...but it doesn't have the prioritization, etc angle working for it. And I'm not a huge fan of the GM fiat "here is a token for good roleplaying rather than accepting this complication" deal. With 4e? I would probably go with some kind of "here is a token you can cash in in the future for an Advantage in an SC or a No Action Recharge 5, 6 roll for an Encounter Power...but I'm going to complicate your life with [I]+n[/I] encounter budget for this combat or 1 more Hard DC in this SC...deal?" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Narrativist" 9-point alignment
Top