Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Nasty trick - will it work?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 1283629" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>What is this concept of the "action is completed"? There is a concept of the action being interrupted (and not being completed as desired), but there is no concept of the "action being started" followed by "action being completed". There are no rules for that. Please quote one.</p><p></p><p>You declare your action. Whether that action turns out the way you want it to or not is irrelevant to your declaration of what you are doing.</p><p></p><p>"Most spells have a casting time of 1 standard action. A spell cast in this manner immediately takes effect."</p><p></p><p>"You make all pertinent decisions about a spell (range, target, area, effect, version, and so forth) when the spell comes into effect."</p><p></p><p>The caster effectively decides what he is doing and he decides everything when he starts casting (for a spell that takes a standard action). There is no "game mechanic" of this being segregated into multiple different components of the standard action. There are "game mechanics" that it can be interrupted (via AoO, via Concentration, via a Readied action), but once he starts to cast (which is often the condition for an interrupting Readied action), according to the two rules I quoted above, he has made all of the pertinent decisions on the spell.</p><p></p><p>That's the rules.</p><p></p><p>If you want to interpret them to mean something other than what they say, that's ok for your game. But, that's a house rule.</p><p></p><p>If you still think you are correct, quote a rule that supports your position. The two rules I quoted do not support your position.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You make the pertinent decisions when the spell comes into effect and it comes into effect immediately unless another rule like an AoO interrupts it. If it is not interrupted, it is cast immediately. Even if it is interrupted, it is cast immediately and normally unless some condition of casting is prevented (like a failed concentration roll or the line of effect being lost).</p><p></p><p>And, this applies to all actions unless the rules specify otherwise.</p><p></p><p>You declare your Power Attack ratio when you declare the attack action, not after you find out that a readied action tripped the opponent you were about to attack. </p><p></p><p>The resolution of an action is only handled after all of the details of the action are declared. The only possible exception to this is Movement Actions where it is unclear.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 1283629, member: 2011"] What is this concept of the "action is completed"? There is a concept of the action being interrupted (and not being completed as desired), but there is no concept of the "action being started" followed by "action being completed". There are no rules for that. Please quote one. You declare your action. Whether that action turns out the way you want it to or not is irrelevant to your declaration of what you are doing. "Most spells have a casting time of 1 standard action. A spell cast in this manner immediately takes effect." "You make all pertinent decisions about a spell (range, target, area, effect, version, and so forth) when the spell comes into effect." The caster effectively decides what he is doing and he decides everything when he starts casting (for a spell that takes a standard action). There is no "game mechanic" of this being segregated into multiple different components of the standard action. There are "game mechanics" that it can be interrupted (via AoO, via Concentration, via a Readied action), but once he starts to cast (which is often the condition for an interrupting Readied action), according to the two rules I quoted above, he has made all of the pertinent decisions on the spell. That's the rules. If you want to interpret them to mean something other than what they say, that's ok for your game. But, that's a house rule. If you still think you are correct, quote a rule that supports your position. The two rules I quoted do not support your position. You make the pertinent decisions when the spell comes into effect and it comes into effect immediately unless another rule like an AoO interrupts it. If it is not interrupted, it is cast immediately. Even if it is interrupted, it is cast immediately and normally unless some condition of casting is prevented (like a failed concentration roll or the line of effect being lost). And, this applies to all actions unless the rules specify otherwise. You declare your Power Attack ratio when you declare the attack action, not after you find out that a readied action tripped the opponent you were about to attack. The resolution of an action is only handled after all of the details of the action are declared. The only possible exception to this is Movement Actions where it is unclear. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Nasty trick - will it work?
Top