Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Natural 20's & 1's?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 5331615" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>[MENTION=31734]Infiniti2000[/MENTION]</p><p> </p><p> I disagree. But...</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>[MENTION=65116]Chris Knapp[/MENTION]</p><p> </p><p>I have to 100% agree with this. Nobody likes their character looking stupid. As a DM, I don't want to, nor do I, seek to make a character look stupid (however, a player making their own character look stupid is an entirely other matter, and probably their own fault<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />). I also don't like the <em>"your weapon goes flying"</em> penalty either. It compounds the penalty of not being able to attack, with the vulnerability(ies) experienced while attempting to retrieve the weapon - that to me, just doesn't seem fair.</p><p> </p><p>What I do instead on a natural 1, is that there's a small chance (5%-10%) that they've broken their weapon (unless magical, or an heirloom/named weapon - which I give straight plot immunity). If they don't break their weapon, then they've simply overextended themself and made themselves more vulnarable than normal (providing a -1 to -3 penalty to defense for the next attack from that opponent - and that opponent only).</p><p> </p><p>Even in heroic fantasy fiction, there's the precedent for the hero's weapon breaking, or the enemy getting a good shot in on them due to a mistake (it would still be just a normal attack, at a slight defense penalty, against only one opponent - not a critical or an automatic hit and no extra penalty against multiple attackers).</p><p> </p><p>It kind of models fights like Kevin Costner and Alan Rickman (Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Notingham). The Sheriff, wielding Robins' Fathers' sword, breaks the sword that Robin is wielding (a simple, mundane sword) and gets in a "hit" that cuts Robins chin - giving him a scar to which the sheriff says: <em>"Now we're even!"</em>.</p><p> </p><p>It's a simple houserule that adds some extra dread to a fumble, without significantly altering the balance of the game, and provides for extra dramatic opportunities. (In other words, no sadism, only drama.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 5331615, member: 59506"] [MENTION=31734]Infiniti2000[/MENTION] I disagree. But... [MENTION=65116]Chris Knapp[/MENTION] I have to 100% agree with this. Nobody likes their character looking stupid. As a DM, I don't want to, nor do I, seek to make a character look stupid (however, a player making their own character look stupid is an entirely other matter, and probably their own fault;)). I also don't like the [I]"your weapon goes flying"[/I] penalty either. It compounds the penalty of not being able to attack, with the vulnerability(ies) experienced while attempting to retrieve the weapon - that to me, just doesn't seem fair. What I do instead on a natural 1, is that there's a small chance (5%-10%) that they've broken their weapon (unless magical, or an heirloom/named weapon - which I give straight plot immunity). If they don't break their weapon, then they've simply overextended themself and made themselves more vulnarable than normal (providing a -1 to -3 penalty to defense for the next attack from that opponent - and that opponent only). Even in heroic fantasy fiction, there's the precedent for the hero's weapon breaking, or the enemy getting a good shot in on them due to a mistake (it would still be just a normal attack, at a slight defense penalty, against only one opponent - not a critical or an automatic hit and no extra penalty against multiple attackers). It kind of models fights like Kevin Costner and Alan Rickman (Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Notingham). The Sheriff, wielding Robins' Fathers' sword, breaks the sword that Robin is wielding (a simple, mundane sword) and gets in a "hit" that cuts Robins chin - giving him a scar to which the sheriff says: [I]"Now we're even!"[/I]. It's a simple houserule that adds some extra dread to a fumble, without significantly altering the balance of the game, and provides for extra dramatic opportunities. (In other words, no sadism, only drama.:p) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Natural 20's & 1's?
Top