Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Natural Attack + Monk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Caeleddin" data-source="post: 2253532" data-attributes="member: 31912"><p>YOU think the FAQ is incorrect. However, unless the FAQ states otherwise, it is the correct version. It is the rules put forth by the makers of the game (or at least, as close to it as you can get). Thus, it takes precedence over what YOU think.</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Unless you are claiming to be Gary Gygax?</p><p> </p><p>The problem here is you refusing to see that you have NO STANDING WHATSOEVER. You are not the FAQ, you are not an official source, and you are definitely not God. Get over yourself. Anything you say that contradicts the FAQ or sourcebooks is a House Rule. The FAQ clarified a murky part of the sourcebook. That is all.</p><p> </p><p>I do not see any problem with the FAQ ruling. It is based on the same mechanics as TWF and natural attacks that appear time and again throughout all three core rulebooks. Yes, it deserves a nerfing, no one is denying that (other than the munchkin Monk players). However, for you to claim your view as the only valid one and that even the FAQ is wrong because you said so is absurd at best.</p><p> </p><p>In my view, the FAQ takes precedence over you. The FAQ comes from a noted source. You, on the other hand, is an unknown. In the same manner, I will take the word of Einstein on the Theory of Relativity over yours.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Caeleddin, post: 2253532, member: 31912"] YOU think the FAQ is incorrect. However, unless the FAQ states otherwise, it is the correct version. It is the rules put forth by the makers of the game (or at least, as close to it as you can get). Thus, it takes precedence over what YOU think. Unless you are claiming to be Gary Gygax? The problem here is you refusing to see that you have NO STANDING WHATSOEVER. You are not the FAQ, you are not an official source, and you are definitely not God. Get over yourself. Anything you say that contradicts the FAQ or sourcebooks is a House Rule. The FAQ clarified a murky part of the sourcebook. That is all. I do not see any problem with the FAQ ruling. It is based on the same mechanics as TWF and natural attacks that appear time and again throughout all three core rulebooks. Yes, it deserves a nerfing, no one is denying that (other than the munchkin Monk players). However, for you to claim your view as the only valid one and that even the FAQ is wrong because you said so is absurd at best. In my view, the FAQ takes precedence over you. The FAQ comes from a noted source. You, on the other hand, is an unknown. In the same manner, I will take the word of Einstein on the Theory of Relativity over yours. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Natural Attack + Monk
Top