hanniball said:A creature attacking with it's natural attacks may attempt a grapple check for each natural attack it would receive (4 in your case). The damage dealt would be related to which natural weapon you're using on each particular check.
Stalker0 said:But can't a creature substitute their natural attack damage for their unarmed damage? I believe a monk can do this can he not, or is that just a special ability of monks?
No. If you use the attack your opponent option, the only allowance for multiple attacks is via iterative attacks, and natural weapons do not use iterative attacks. There's no option for a full attack, though many of us allow it as a houserule (with the -4 penalty). With respect to the thread on the FAQ, the FAQ states:Sejs said:Option B) Attack. Assuming the creature doesn't have any manufactured weapons handy and doesn't want to attack with unarmed strikes due to their natural weapons being superior, you make a full attack as normal for the creature's natural attack routine. Each attack also suffers an additional -4 to hit. Their primary natural weapon would be at -4, and each secondary natural weapon would be at -9, assuming they don't have the Multiattack feat, in which case it'd be -4/-6.
3.5 Main FAQ said:How many attacks does a creature with multiple natural weapons get while it’s grappling? How many grapple checks can it make in a round?
Under normal circumstances, a creature can can attack with only one of its natural weapons while grappling (and it takes a –4 penalty on such attacks; PH 156). A grappling dire bear can attack with either a claw or its bite.
The rake special attack gives the creature “two additional claw attacks that it can use only against a grappled foe” (and which don’t take the normal –4 penalty to such attacks; MM
314).
A creature that chooses to make grapple checks in place of attacks—that is, to damage its opponent, escape from the grapple, move, pin its opponent, or use its opponent’s weapon—is allowed one grapple check for every attack that its base attack bonus would allow (even if it doesn’t normally make multiple attacks in this manner). These attacks deal damage as an unarmed strike made by a creature of that size (1d3 for Medium, 1d4 for Large, 1d6 for Huge, and so forth, plus its Strength modifier).
A creature with BAB +0 to +5 may make one grapple check in place of an attack, BAB +6 to +10 two, BAB +11 to +15 three, and BAB +16 to +20 four. The dire bear, for example, may make two grapple checks in place of attacks, thanks to its base attack bonus of +9: one using its full BAB and the second using its BAB –5.
Infiniti2000 said:No. If you use the attack your opponent option, the only allowance for multiple attacks is via iterative attacks, and natural weapons do not use iterative attacks. There's no option for a full attack, though many of us allow it as a houserule (with the -4 penalty). With respect to the thread on the FAQ, the FAQ states:
"Wrong" depends upon your point of view. I personally think you've been doing it "right" even if it's not the RAW.Sejs said:Aha, good to know - thanks. I had been doing this wrong it seems.