Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7896920" data-attributes="member: 15700">Well, you win the irony award, that's for sure. I'm not telling you what to feel.  In fact, I've explicitly said several times do what you want. Rather, it you who have been saying a person can't accept the rule unless it's in bad faith like it's an objective thing. It's YOU who are telling others how they should treat the scenario.The only thing I'm doing is telling you what the actual rule is, which isn't up for debate, because it's objective. We have clear references to point to which give the rule, from the game designer himself.The only part of my post that speculative was me pointing out that you argued it's a bad rule that shouldn't exist because it breaks suspense of disbelief (for you), in a game that is full of abstract rules, like the basis of hit points, seems a pretty odd position to have. I.e, not one applied consistently.Either way, I'm not going to argue it. It's the rule. Do what you want at your table. But it's a settled issue. So good day. I'm done.</blockquote>