Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7897206" data-attributes="member: 15700">Speaking of ignoring questions, no one has bothered to answer the one I've posed this entire time. What part of "unarmed attacks are not considered weapons" is vague, or ambiguous. Because every time I say the rule is settled because Jeremy has said that SEVERAL times on various forms of communication, folks keep disagreeing. So why not answer it ?  All you do is complain how you don't agree with it, or how not everyone is on Twitter, which isn't the point I've argued at all. The only thing I've said is that it's a settled rule. Because it is. That is not under dispute, and your inference that it is because some people haven't seen it is fundamentally flawed for reasons I gave above. So how about answering my question I've been asking for a long time, if you want people to answer questions.</blockquote>