Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Natural Weapons and Reach Weapons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kahuna Burger" data-source="post: 3435696" data-attributes="member: 8439"><p>while I admire your ability to actually use "begs the question" corectly, no, not any more than you are. </p><p></p><p>I rule that a feat with heavy prereqs is more than sufficient to get a +1 to AC, without charging -2 to attacks on even stardard action single attacks. The feat essentially turns your offhand weapon into a very pointy and wimpy shield for which you have the improved shield bash feat.</p><p></p><p>But then, I don't subscribe to the idea that one is ever "simply holding" two weapons in the way you have proposed here. I simply rule that you have two weapons, both or neither of which you may choose to attack with in any given round depending on your needs, but if you choose to take an extra attack with one, you are penalized -2 on all your attack rolls for that round. If you do not have the twf feat, you take penalties with the off hand weapon and are charged even greater penalties for taking the extra attack. </p><p></p><p>I understand that you are choosing to see it differently, and I will not be accusing you of logical falacies for disagreeing with me, but I think it is nerfing an already unpowered fighting style to no purpose I understand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kahuna Burger, post: 3435696, member: 8439"] while I admire your ability to actually use "begs the question" corectly, no, not any more than you are. I rule that a feat with heavy prereqs is more than sufficient to get a +1 to AC, without charging -2 to attacks on even stardard action single attacks. The feat essentially turns your offhand weapon into a very pointy and wimpy shield for which you have the improved shield bash feat. But then, I don't subscribe to the idea that one is ever "simply holding" two weapons in the way you have proposed here. I simply rule that you have two weapons, both or neither of which you may choose to attack with in any given round depending on your needs, but if you choose to take an extra attack with one, you are penalized -2 on all your attack rolls for that round. If you do not have the twf feat, you take penalties with the off hand weapon and are charged even greater penalties for taking the extra attack. I understand that you are choosing to see it differently, and I will not be accusing you of logical falacies for disagreeing with me, but I think it is nerfing an already unpowered fighting style to no purpose I understand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Natural Weapons and Reach Weapons
Top