Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Naturalist" Alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoogleEmpMog" data-source="post: 1926885" data-attributes="member: 22882"><p>St. Thomas Aquinas famously said (disclaimer: almost nobody knows or seriously reflects on this, it's NOT one of his famous ideas, and this isn't an exact quote) that if human nature were different, human morality would also be different. In the animal world, this certainly holds true: a wolf's nature, social order and, for lack of a better word, "ethics" are radically different from a sheep's, or an ant's.</p><p></p><p>Now, by popular request (disclaimer: one person asked to see it), an alternative to alignment for YOUR grim n' gritty fantasy or hard sci-fi campaign: naturalist alignment!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Essentially, the idea is that each creature has a particular nature that determines what is good (natural) or evil (unnatural) for it. These are actually quite primitive, but combine into complex forms due to their interaction.</p><p></p><p>Each also has a basic unit of society and social order. Wolves (and wolfmen!) have a pack. Humans are family-based and naturally feudal (so are orcs); dwarves place greater weight on the extended family than the nuclear, but are also naturally feudal. Giants are pair-bonders with a subrace-stratified caste system. Elves are unusual among intelligent races in that their basic societal unit is the individual, and they have no broad social order outside of opportunistic cooperation.</p><p></p><p>Some of the natural orders seem abhorrent to other races; elves loath dwarves' instinct to subsume individual goods to community goods, while dwarves think elves completely amoral and painfully lonely.</p><p></p><p>An elf who tries to live like a dwarf will inevitably become corrupt and degenerate; so too, a dwarf who tries to live like an elf. Thus lies the path of madness, the path of what each race calls evil. Even if it at first seems a road paved with good intentions...</p><p></p><p>Intelligent species like humans, elves and dwarves all have the opportunity to go against their natures by making (seemingly) rational choices. They may try to live like members of other races, or even to invent for themselves a whole new society... but they still walk the path to ruin, blasphemy and madness.</p><p></p><p>In D&D terms, this means that Good, Evil, Neutral, Lawful and Chaotic spells and abilities are replaced by Natural and Unnatural spells and abilities (Smite Unnature, for instance, will smite an egalatarian orc, a Cthulu-worshipping anything, or a feudal elf with equal efficacy, according to the base system) and spells and abilities with a racial qualifier (Smite Orc, Smite Elf, Smite Dwarf, etc.).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoogleEmpMog, post: 1926885, member: 22882"] St. Thomas Aquinas famously said (disclaimer: almost nobody knows or seriously reflects on this, it's NOT one of his famous ideas, and this isn't an exact quote) that if human nature were different, human morality would also be different. In the animal world, this certainly holds true: a wolf's nature, social order and, for lack of a better word, "ethics" are radically different from a sheep's, or an ant's. Now, by popular request (disclaimer: one person asked to see it), an alternative to alignment for YOUR grim n' gritty fantasy or hard sci-fi campaign: naturalist alignment! Essentially, the idea is that each creature has a particular nature that determines what is good (natural) or evil (unnatural) for it. These are actually quite primitive, but combine into complex forms due to their interaction. Each also has a basic unit of society and social order. Wolves (and wolfmen!) have a pack. Humans are family-based and naturally feudal (so are orcs); dwarves place greater weight on the extended family than the nuclear, but are also naturally feudal. Giants are pair-bonders with a subrace-stratified caste system. Elves are unusual among intelligent races in that their basic societal unit is the individual, and they have no broad social order outside of opportunistic cooperation. Some of the natural orders seem abhorrent to other races; elves loath dwarves' instinct to subsume individual goods to community goods, while dwarves think elves completely amoral and painfully lonely. An elf who tries to live like a dwarf will inevitably become corrupt and degenerate; so too, a dwarf who tries to live like an elf. Thus lies the path of madness, the path of what each race calls evil. Even if it at first seems a road paved with good intentions... Intelligent species like humans, elves and dwarves all have the opportunity to go against their natures by making (seemingly) rational choices. They may try to live like members of other races, or even to invent for themselves a whole new society... but they still walk the path to ruin, blasphemy and madness. In D&D terms, this means that Good, Evil, Neutral, Lawful and Chaotic spells and abilities are replaced by Natural and Unnatural spells and abilities (Smite Unnature, for instance, will smite an egalatarian orc, a Cthulu-worshipping anything, or a feudal elf with equal efficacy, according to the base system) and spells and abilities with a racial qualifier (Smite Orc, Smite Elf, Smite Dwarf, etc.). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Naturalist" Alignment
Top