Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Necromancer Games-update by Orcus
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dm4hire" data-source="post: 4833412" data-attributes="member: 14848"><p>I think you missed the point of that section. Clark was referring to the fact that had everything gone smoothly Paizo would have continued to support WotC and embraced 4e. Unfortunately things didn't go smoothly and fortunately we have Pathfinder as a result.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If WotC embraced POD there would be no glut as only those interested in earlier editions would order and purchase the products. Whether done by WotC or by Lulu, doesn't make a difference as it would be strictly on demand.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually POD costs are reasonable, especially given the size of 1e books or most of 2e. Cost could also be lowered by the availability of softcover alternatives.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a some what flawed view as most publishers try to stick close to the original design for the sole purpose of retaining customer loyalty. There are quite a few RPGs with revisions and new editions that require very little backward compatibility. Many of those that do made the proper decision to separate the new edition from the old edition to eliminate the necessity, i.e. WoD changed complete mythology.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again I think Clark was implying that there are ways for WotC to fix a lot of the division forming within the community and gather back what has already been lost already. The real focus should be "D&D the game" and not "D&D the edition" which is what everyone has been shouting since 2e hit the streets way back then (heck even I just wanted TSR to edit and hopefully consolidate all the non-setting books and update the settings in 1e). If WotC brought back earlier editions via POD or even open sourced them, but then supported said product by creating edition neutral material I think they would see a huge resurgence, not just in revenue but in the hobby in general. </p><p></p><p>The effective stance would be to sell it like McD, saying "Have it your way." WotC could sell the core books for whatever the new edition is in store, but make the old editions available through POD for those who just aren't satisfied or don't want change.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dm4hire, post: 4833412, member: 14848"] I think you missed the point of that section. Clark was referring to the fact that had everything gone smoothly Paizo would have continued to support WotC and embraced 4e. Unfortunately things didn't go smoothly and fortunately we have Pathfinder as a result. If WotC embraced POD there would be no glut as only those interested in earlier editions would order and purchase the products. Whether done by WotC or by Lulu, doesn't make a difference as it would be strictly on demand. Actually POD costs are reasonable, especially given the size of 1e books or most of 2e. Cost could also be lowered by the availability of softcover alternatives. This is a some what flawed view as most publishers try to stick close to the original design for the sole purpose of retaining customer loyalty. There are quite a few RPGs with revisions and new editions that require very little backward compatibility. Many of those that do made the proper decision to separate the new edition from the old edition to eliminate the necessity, i.e. WoD changed complete mythology. Again I think Clark was implying that there are ways for WotC to fix a lot of the division forming within the community and gather back what has already been lost already. The real focus should be "D&D the game" and not "D&D the edition" which is what everyone has been shouting since 2e hit the streets way back then (heck even I just wanted TSR to edit and hopefully consolidate all the non-setting books and update the settings in 1e). If WotC brought back earlier editions via POD or even open sourced them, but then supported said product by creating edition neutral material I think they would see a huge resurgence, not just in revenue but in the hobby in general. The effective stance would be to sell it like McD, saying "Have it your way." WotC could sell the core books for whatever the new edition is in store, but make the old editions available through POD for those who just aren't satisfied or don't want change. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Necromancer Games-update by Orcus
Top