Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Need advice on how to rationalize terms of surrender to a beholder...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Klaudius Rex" data-source="post: 6900159" data-attributes="member: 6807408"><p>Ok, so first of all thanks to everyone who helped me with the post i wrote asking for traps for a beholder lair. I implemented a lot of your advice, and turns out 3 out of 6 characters died.</p><p></p><p>What i need help this time is rationalizing the terms of their surrender to the Xazax the Eyemongrel beholder.</p><p></p><p>So, my characters went looking for his beholder named Xazax, who this would have been their second fight against him. The first time was a TPK, but instead of killing all the players, Xazax instructed them to take the eyestalks of Lorthuun, another beholder who is friendly to the group, believe it or not. Of course, the players did no such thing, and went after Xazax wanting revenge. This time, they brought support.</p><p></p><p>But that still was not enough. Xazax was ready for them. And 3 out of 6 players died today!!</p><p></p><p>However, beforehand they fought some nothics, and approximately 1 mile near Xazax's lair, they started seeing eyeballs in the walls and darkness watching them. So much in fact that one of the floating eyeballs was taken by the players.</p><p></p><p>Then they went to face Xazax a second time, and lost. Since Xazax knew that the characters did not return with the eyestalks from Lorthunn, this surrender would have to be especially good. So the group bluffed Xazax into accepting the floating eye. Xazax lost the perception roll and accepted the floating eye that they found as payment for their lives and let them go. </p><p></p><p>I puurposely put the floating eye in the game before the fight with Xazax to give the players a chance to role play and possibly avoid death or to bargain with as they did in case they were wiped out like in what happened. </p><p></p><p>My question is, what do you think about this? Would Xazax be cool accepting a floating eye that would have been part of his lair anyways in the surrounding 1 mile? Should the floating ey be one of the nothics? How can i rationalize or otherwise spin a good reason for Xazax accepting an eyeball that isnt what he asked for in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Let me know what you think...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Klaudius Rex, post: 6900159, member: 6807408"] Ok, so first of all thanks to everyone who helped me with the post i wrote asking for traps for a beholder lair. I implemented a lot of your advice, and turns out 3 out of 6 characters died. What i need help this time is rationalizing the terms of their surrender to the Xazax the Eyemongrel beholder. So, my characters went looking for his beholder named Xazax, who this would have been their second fight against him. The first time was a TPK, but instead of killing all the players, Xazax instructed them to take the eyestalks of Lorthuun, another beholder who is friendly to the group, believe it or not. Of course, the players did no such thing, and went after Xazax wanting revenge. This time, they brought support. But that still was not enough. Xazax was ready for them. And 3 out of 6 players died today!! However, beforehand they fought some nothics, and approximately 1 mile near Xazax's lair, they started seeing eyeballs in the walls and darkness watching them. So much in fact that one of the floating eyeballs was taken by the players. Then they went to face Xazax a second time, and lost. Since Xazax knew that the characters did not return with the eyestalks from Lorthunn, this surrender would have to be especially good. So the group bluffed Xazax into accepting the floating eye. Xazax lost the perception roll and accepted the floating eye that they found as payment for their lives and let them go. I puurposely put the floating eye in the game before the fight with Xazax to give the players a chance to role play and possibly avoid death or to bargain with as they did in case they were wiped out like in what happened. My question is, what do you think about this? Would Xazax be cool accepting a floating eye that would have been part of his lair anyways in the surrounding 1 mile? Should the floating ey be one of the nothics? How can i rationalize or otherwise spin a good reason for Xazax accepting an eyeball that isnt what he asked for in the first place. Let me know what you think... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Need advice on how to rationalize terms of surrender to a beholder...
Top