Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Need clarification on "No Retailer Links" rule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve Conan Trustrum" data-source="post: 2667053" data-attributes="member: 1620"><p>Morrus, the tone of your words spoke a great deal. Yes, there was certainly more than mere interest in EnWorld's interests at heart when press releases were made, but the tone of your words, especially within the context of this thread and what it entails, goes beyond the literal and I don't believe you're unaware of that.</p><p></p><p>The context of what the forum serves beyond press releases alone, and the nature of the site overall, would definately categorize them as something other than an ad to me, a person who deals directly with advertising in a non-retailer capacity. It's not my site, however, so I'm afraid we'll have to continue to disagree there.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But you don't see how people are left scratching their heads over this considering how recent the indicent with the RPGnow leak is? I hardly think this is a decision you came to overnight and wasn't in the works at the time.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Communicating is more than just quoting and literal translation, Morrus. The situational context is a big part of it. The implications are a big part of it. The quote I replied to in the post you are replying to here is a big part of it. Now, it's entirely possible you misspoke or intoned something you didn't mean to. However, I can't believe that--were you to reread that post--you can't see how people can look at your words therein and draw the conclusion you're refuting, especially considering what the post your words were replying to was saying.</p><p></p><p>I don't think you owe myself or any other publisher anything, Morrus. You made a situation availlable to myself and others under certain terms and we all took advantage of that. However, as you now say, many publishers returned that favor by assisting EnWorld in a number of ways to create a two way relationship. It was a symbiotic give and take. I wouldn't be suprised if much of that goes away now on the part of the publishers. Yes, I'm certain most (myself included) will continue to post link-free press releases here but I think you'll also find many will view this as a slap in the face and won't invest as much effort or support in the site. </p><p></p><p>As you say, it's a two way road but when one party begins putting up road blocks along the best path to one's destination, people inevitably look for other roads to travel upon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve Conan Trustrum, post: 2667053, member: 1620"] Morrus, the tone of your words spoke a great deal. Yes, there was certainly more than mere interest in EnWorld's interests at heart when press releases were made, but the tone of your words, especially within the context of this thread and what it entails, goes beyond the literal and I don't believe you're unaware of that. The context of what the forum serves beyond press releases alone, and the nature of the site overall, would definately categorize them as something other than an ad to me, a person who deals directly with advertising in a non-retailer capacity. It's not my site, however, so I'm afraid we'll have to continue to disagree there. But you don't see how people are left scratching their heads over this considering how recent the indicent with the RPGnow leak is? I hardly think this is a decision you came to overnight and wasn't in the works at the time. Communicating is more than just quoting and literal translation, Morrus. The situational context is a big part of it. The implications are a big part of it. The quote I replied to in the post you are replying to here is a big part of it. Now, it's entirely possible you misspoke or intoned something you didn't mean to. However, I can't believe that--were you to reread that post--you can't see how people can look at your words therein and draw the conclusion you're refuting, especially considering what the post your words were replying to was saying. I don't think you owe myself or any other publisher anything, Morrus. You made a situation availlable to myself and others under certain terms and we all took advantage of that. However, as you now say, many publishers returned that favor by assisting EnWorld in a number of ways to create a two way relationship. It was a symbiotic give and take. I wouldn't be suprised if much of that goes away now on the part of the publishers. Yes, I'm certain most (myself included) will continue to post link-free press releases here but I think you'll also find many will view this as a slap in the face and won't invest as much effort or support in the site. As you say, it's a two way road but when one party begins putting up road blocks along the best path to one's destination, people inevitably look for other roads to travel upon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Need clarification on "No Retailer Links" rule
Top