Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Need clarification on "No Retailer Links" rule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve Conan Trustrum" data-source="post: 2668595" data-attributes="member: 1620"><p>You may want to ask some how their sales have since been doing before speculating how well it's worked out for them so far. You're also forgetting that this change was still done on the industry's largest storefront--THE place to go for RPG PDFs. It's a statistical certainty that the change has caused sales reductions, but it's also likely that it's spread across the various publishers enough this early on to not be affecting anyone too badly. EnWorld doesn't have that benefit.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Because it's not a Chicken Little situation. Part of my day job is web usability testing (in other words, checking out the effect of this very thing on customer online purchasing habits) for companies with online services and products. Something that comes up with EVERY such study is the amount of clicks the average online consumer tolerates before saying "this is too much trouble" and moving on. The ideal number of clicks is 3, with each additional click beyond that creating a compounding reduction in the chance of a purchase being made. Amazon.com's sales rose dramatically as soon as it introduced one-click purchasing forthis very reason. That's a fact, and EnWorld users are typically going to be no smarter than any of these other consumers, nor are they any more willing to put up with things that slow down their online purchases (if you keep in mind that the main reason for online purchasing is speed and convenience.) Adding a redirect to the mix creates a minimum of one additional click--that's 33% of the ideal allotment--and doesn't account for design issues on the publisher's side.</p><p></p><p>That's not speculation.</p><p></p><p>That's not Chicken little.</p><p></p><p>That's not a matter of giving EnWorld users too little credit.</p><p></p><p>That's nearly a decade of hard facts gathered during thousands of studies designed around determining just how far an online customer is willing to put up with a round-about sales process online. Now, I'm not going to put words in any other publisher's mouth, but even losing one or two sales over this because some customers find it too annoying not to have all the relevant information immediately on hand is one or two more than I'd care to loose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve Conan Trustrum, post: 2668595, member: 1620"] You may want to ask some how their sales have since been doing before speculating how well it's worked out for them so far. You're also forgetting that this change was still done on the industry's largest storefront--THE place to go for RPG PDFs. It's a statistical certainty that the change has caused sales reductions, but it's also likely that it's spread across the various publishers enough this early on to not be affecting anyone too badly. EnWorld doesn't have that benefit. Because it's not a Chicken Little situation. Part of my day job is web usability testing (in other words, checking out the effect of this very thing on customer online purchasing habits) for companies with online services and products. Something that comes up with EVERY such study is the amount of clicks the average online consumer tolerates before saying "this is too much trouble" and moving on. The ideal number of clicks is 3, with each additional click beyond that creating a compounding reduction in the chance of a purchase being made. Amazon.com's sales rose dramatically as soon as it introduced one-click purchasing forthis very reason. That's a fact, and EnWorld users are typically going to be no smarter than any of these other consumers, nor are they any more willing to put up with things that slow down their online purchases (if you keep in mind that the main reason for online purchasing is speed and convenience.) Adding a redirect to the mix creates a minimum of one additional click--that's 33% of the ideal allotment--and doesn't account for design issues on the publisher's side. That's not speculation. That's not Chicken little. That's not a matter of giving EnWorld users too little credit. That's nearly a decade of hard facts gathered during thousands of studies designed around determining just how far an online customer is willing to put up with a round-about sales process online. Now, I'm not going to put words in any other publisher's mouth, but even losing one or two sales over this because some customers find it too annoying not to have all the relevant information immediately on hand is one or two more than I'd care to loose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Need clarification on "No Retailer Links" rule
Top