Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Need clarification on "No Retailer Links" rule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smokewolf" data-source="post: 2669565" data-attributes="member: 16839"><p>The links themselves are not an issue for me, its the loss of an unbias news source that I hate to see gone. By restricting what someone can write (which is your right, it is your place) while at the same time promoting a commercial enterprise in which you have a vested interest creates a very bias press engine.</p><p></p><p>I would have no problem if this policy had been different, such as a blanket no PR or no links even to ENSHOP or drop the news side altogether. </p><p></p><p>But your stance no longer places you in a neutral position. You have taken a side now in the industry. You have a commerical entity directly ties to your news agency which now has been given preferential treatment over your competitors. I think everyone that uses you as a news service needs to feel that they can trust the news they get to be unbias, honest and complete. And this relationship erodes that trust.</p><p></p><p>Imagine what would happen if there is a financial issue that arises out of ENSHOP with one or more vendors. What if the problem is on your end (say misappropiation of funds)? What if the problem is on their end (plagerized material or inflated sales or theft of others materials)? As someone who is places themselves in a news delivery position, any of the information regarding such matters is slanted (even if there is an attempt at honesty). The fact is you are a participant and are no longer independant.</p><p></p><p>And there is the whole matter of reviews now that there is more of a financial investment that those products you are selling sale well. With ENPUB, because of the air of transparency and the fact that so many of us were actually purchasing ENPUB material there was no reason to doubt the accuracy and intention of reviews. But now, any publisher who receives a low review and is not on your ENSHOP and then brings it up will further erode any sense of impartiality that you try to create. They do not have to right, they only need to create doubt in peoples mind. Or if a product is marked consistently low elsewheres but is ranked rather high here, again people are more than capable of inventing their own conspiracies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smokewolf, post: 2669565, member: 16839"] The links themselves are not an issue for me, its the loss of an unbias news source that I hate to see gone. By restricting what someone can write (which is your right, it is your place) while at the same time promoting a commercial enterprise in which you have a vested interest creates a very bias press engine. I would have no problem if this policy had been different, such as a blanket no PR or no links even to ENSHOP or drop the news side altogether. But your stance no longer places you in a neutral position. You have taken a side now in the industry. You have a commerical entity directly ties to your news agency which now has been given preferential treatment over your competitors. I think everyone that uses you as a news service needs to feel that they can trust the news they get to be unbias, honest and complete. And this relationship erodes that trust. Imagine what would happen if there is a financial issue that arises out of ENSHOP with one or more vendors. What if the problem is on your end (say misappropiation of funds)? What if the problem is on their end (plagerized material or inflated sales or theft of others materials)? As someone who is places themselves in a news delivery position, any of the information regarding such matters is slanted (even if there is an attempt at honesty). The fact is you are a participant and are no longer independant. And there is the whole matter of reviews now that there is more of a financial investment that those products you are selling sale well. With ENPUB, because of the air of transparency and the fact that so many of us were actually purchasing ENPUB material there was no reason to doubt the accuracy and intention of reviews. But now, any publisher who receives a low review and is not on your ENSHOP and then brings it up will further erode any sense of impartiality that you try to create. They do not have to right, they only need to create doubt in peoples mind. Or if a product is marked consistently low elsewheres but is ranked rather high here, again people are more than capable of inventing their own conspiracies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Need clarification on "No Retailer Links" rule
Top