Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Need clarification on "No Retailer Links" rule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve Conan Trustrum" data-source="post: 2669707" data-attributes="member: 1620"><p>We'll add an extra step to the logic train then <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>You bring up the point that you've got emails from people telling you to stick to your guns so that my customer's email isn't relevant to either side. That's not true. My customer base is a LOT smaller than EnWorld's membership, so the fact even one has emailed me about this speak volumes as compare to the ratio of emails to members EnWorld has over all. And yes, even just one email to this affect proves that this policy has a negative effect on customers--once that single email comes in, no amount of emails to the contrary can ever prove otherwise. We do indeed move from the evidence proving my point to you deciding what to do with that evidence, but you've already said that you don't plan on making alterations.</p><p></p><p>My further point is that the one email I got, while numerically insignificant to you and the large body of EnWorld, has a much greater effect for me, who obviously has a smaller body of customers than you have members. That means the decisions I make will necessarily be based more on those few voices, and I imagine the same will go for other publishers if they began getting similar emails from their customers. All members of EnWorld are people looking into what EnWorld has to offer, yet not all members of EnWorld are customers of myself or any other publisher, so the smaller voices have to count for more with us and the danger therein is that if those small voices become loud enough with enough publishers, EnWorld risks losing a lot of what sets it a part from the rest of the d20 sites.</p><p></p><p>As a publisher, I've enjoyed talking with other publishers here and gaining promotional advantages the site has previously afforded. Long before I was a publisher, I enjoyed reading what goes on here way back to when Eric still ran the place. I've been here a long time and think fondly on almost all that period. However, if my customers begin telling me I'm wasting their time here I'm likely going to start considering what they have to say regardless of how their numbers stack up against EnWorld's overall membership.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve Conan Trustrum, post: 2669707, member: 1620"] We'll add an extra step to the logic train then :D You bring up the point that you've got emails from people telling you to stick to your guns so that my customer's email isn't relevant to either side. That's not true. My customer base is a LOT smaller than EnWorld's membership, so the fact even one has emailed me about this speak volumes as compare to the ratio of emails to members EnWorld has over all. And yes, even just one email to this affect proves that this policy has a negative effect on customers--once that single email comes in, no amount of emails to the contrary can ever prove otherwise. We do indeed move from the evidence proving my point to you deciding what to do with that evidence, but you've already said that you don't plan on making alterations. My further point is that the one email I got, while numerically insignificant to you and the large body of EnWorld, has a much greater effect for me, who obviously has a smaller body of customers than you have members. That means the decisions I make will necessarily be based more on those few voices, and I imagine the same will go for other publishers if they began getting similar emails from their customers. All members of EnWorld are people looking into what EnWorld has to offer, yet not all members of EnWorld are customers of myself or any other publisher, so the smaller voices have to count for more with us and the danger therein is that if those small voices become loud enough with enough publishers, EnWorld risks losing a lot of what sets it a part from the rest of the d20 sites. As a publisher, I've enjoyed talking with other publishers here and gaining promotional advantages the site has previously afforded. Long before I was a publisher, I enjoyed reading what goes on here way back to when Eric still ran the place. I've been here a long time and think fondly on almost all that period. However, if my customers begin telling me I'm wasting their time here I'm likely going to start considering what they have to say regardless of how their numbers stack up against EnWorld's overall membership. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Need clarification on "No Retailer Links" rule
Top