Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Need confirmation on number of AoOs for ranged touch spells
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 4724753" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>Why? I can't find a reference to any other kind of attacks in the rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure it is. The AoO rules specifically call out that you make an attack. See rules for attack. Ding. Done.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is where you are slipping. I agree there is a standard usage of the word action, and there is a rules usage of the word action. "Ranged attack" is specifically an action, in the rules sense, that draws an AoO. That rule, however, only applies to using actions to make attacks. That rule does not apply to using actions to cast spells. Just as the rule that you must use full round actions to make multiple attacks does not apply to the multiple rays caused by <em>scorching ray</em>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Technically, I am not basing it on that. There are also some free, immediate, swift, and reaction actions that cause them. But that is not the crux of the matter.</p><p></p><p>What I am saying is that AoOs are caused by specific actions laid out in the rules. One of those conditions is casting a spell, and another one of those conditions is making a ranged attack in combat as an action. The ranged attack that occurs from a ray is incidental to aiming the spell; it is not an action, certain not under the heading on p.135 which is the only place that rule is ever stated generally. </p><p></p><p>You are trying to say that making a ranged attack (in the English sense) provokes an AoO become you provoke an AoO when you make a ranged attack (in the rules sense). Obviously, those terms are not interchangeable uses, so you have a problem right there. But that's not the larger issue. As the rules are laid out, it's more like this:</p><p></p><p>1. There are actions in combat</p><p>2. Combat is an action in combat</p><p>3. I can make a standard or full attack</p><p>4. One of those options is to make a ranged attack.</p><p>5. Making a ranged attack causes an AoO. </p><p></p><p>Step #5 there is not part of the decision tree for spell-casting.</p><p></p><p>1. There are actions in combat</p><p>2. Spellcasting is an action in combat</p><p>3. I can cast a spell that is a standard or full round action</p><p>4. Casting a spell provokes an AoO unless I cast defensively</p><p>5. There are different types of spell</p><p>6. If the spell is a ray, aim it as though it were an attack with a ranged weapon.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Let me ask you this: what if I cast scorching ray and refuse to aim the spell? Do I not draw an AoO? What happens to the ray? </p><p></p><p>Now, conversely, is there a way to fire a bow that does not draw an AoO?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 4724753, member: 15538"] Why? I can't find a reference to any other kind of attacks in the rules. Sure it is. The AoO rules specifically call out that you make an attack. See rules for attack. Ding. Done. This is where you are slipping. I agree there is a standard usage of the word action, and there is a rules usage of the word action. "Ranged attack" is specifically an action, in the rules sense, that draws an AoO. That rule, however, only applies to using actions to make attacks. That rule does not apply to using actions to cast spells. Just as the rule that you must use full round actions to make multiple attacks does not apply to the multiple rays caused by [i]scorching ray[/i]. Technically, I am not basing it on that. There are also some free, immediate, swift, and reaction actions that cause them. But that is not the crux of the matter. What I am saying is that AoOs are caused by specific actions laid out in the rules. One of those conditions is casting a spell, and another one of those conditions is making a ranged attack in combat as an action. The ranged attack that occurs from a ray is incidental to aiming the spell; it is not an action, certain not under the heading on p.135 which is the only place that rule is ever stated generally. You are trying to say that making a ranged attack (in the English sense) provokes an AoO become you provoke an AoO when you make a ranged attack (in the rules sense). Obviously, those terms are not interchangeable uses, so you have a problem right there. But that's not the larger issue. As the rules are laid out, it's more like this: 1. There are actions in combat 2. Combat is an action in combat 3. I can make a standard or full attack 4. One of those options is to make a ranged attack. 5. Making a ranged attack causes an AoO. Step #5 there is not part of the decision tree for spell-casting. 1. There are actions in combat 2. Spellcasting is an action in combat 3. I can cast a spell that is a standard or full round action 4. Casting a spell provokes an AoO unless I cast defensively 5. There are different types of spell 6. If the spell is a ray, aim it as though it were an attack with a ranged weapon. Let me ask you this: what if I cast scorching ray and refuse to aim the spell? Do I not draw an AoO? What happens to the ray? Now, conversely, is there a way to fire a bow that does not draw an AoO? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Need confirmation on number of AoOs for ranged touch spells
Top