Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mr.Satan" data-source="post: 5405564" data-attributes="member: 92340">Oo Arg!!! Shiver me timbers!!! This also depends entirely upon your definition of irrational. On Enworld, much like elsewhere, this varies widely. I've never agreed with that viewpoint. It seems rather arbitrary. See previous.I can actually say that and seem to have done just that. While your intentions may have been different from the way others have viewed your creation, this is only natural. The original paragon was, after all, poorly designed.Your amidah template, however, was excellently designed. Even if your method of designing it wasn't quite rational. You used a horribly flawed template as the basis for your design.Given that you're an excellent designer, the resulting amidah was a vast improvement over the original paragon...both mechanically and thematically. However, your creation created a vacuum and effectively sundered the (already broken) original paragon template. I, like nature, abhor a vacuum. The crux of the matter from your perspective, is irrelevant from my perspective. I prefer a fresh perspective on things. The paragon, as many have pointed out elsewhere, must be able to compete with the amidah. If your take on the paragon were to be accepted as canon, the paragon would be essentially useless and completely unable to fulfill it's designated role of being a threat to the amidah. This is thematically unsound.I disagree. It should be the paragon. It makes far more sense.I will, and your opinion is duly noted.</blockquote>

Verification