Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Need help with metamagic feat idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Matthias" data-source="post: 5965875" data-attributes="member: 3625"><p>All the above has been good input. Probably the most elegant way to 'prescribe' a hits-anyway effects (HAEs0) is to key them off spell school, subschool, descriptor type, and so on, perhaps offering one or two posisble effects for each one, but all standardized.</p><p></p><p> would also confine the HAEs to the power level one expects from alchemical items, perhaps relating them further to a range of alc. item cost (1st-3rd level =~ 0-5 gp, 4th-6th =~ 5-25 gp, 7th-9th level =~ 25 gp and up). The point is entirely valid that a passed save vs. some spell should not rise to the penalty of a failed save of a spell at anywhere near a comparable level. But with this design approach, perhaps a +1 slot adjustment will be necessary, and if the feat is allowed to be applied multiple times for multiple effects, there would be a +1 slot markup for every HAE added.</p><p></p><p>Thus, a necromantic spell with [evil] and [cold] descriptors could take a necromancy, OR an evil, OR a cold hits-anyway-effect for one application of the metamagic.</p><p></p><p>With these specifications, the next question becomes whether a caster should be able to take the feat just once and be able to emphasize any school and any descriptor, or should a caster be limited to a certain list of preselected descriptors, not counting spell school, which are chosen when the feat is taken (for example, 3 + magic ability modifier)?</p><p></p><p>Further, I would not as a rule have other metamagics normally be able to enhance the effects of this feat (i.e. no Maximized HAEs). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How does this look?</p><p></p><p>Emphasized Spell [this is only a placeholder name, I'm not attached to it or anything]</p><p>prereqs: ability to cast magic, magic ability score 13+</p><p>effect: Choose a number of spell schools equal to magic ability modifier. You can add a 'hits anyway effect' according to spell school, of any spell you cast from those school. (Caster can choose from a list of standardized effects at the time the metamagic feat is applied.)</p><p>Special: Feat can be taken multiple times, no stacking, choose additional schools each time feat is taken, etc.</p><p></p><p>Improved Emphasized Spell</p><p>prereq: Emphasized Spell</p><p>effect: similar to parent feat but choose a number of spell descriptors to Emphasize (standardized effects given for each.)</p><p></p><p>Greater Emphasized Spell</p><p>other metamagics can enhance Emphasized Spell HAEs ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Matthias, post: 5965875, member: 3625"] All the above has been good input. Probably the most elegant way to 'prescribe' a hits-anyway effects (HAEs0) is to key them off spell school, subschool, descriptor type, and so on, perhaps offering one or two posisble effects for each one, but all standardized. would also confine the HAEs to the power level one expects from alchemical items, perhaps relating them further to a range of alc. item cost (1st-3rd level =~ 0-5 gp, 4th-6th =~ 5-25 gp, 7th-9th level =~ 25 gp and up). The point is entirely valid that a passed save vs. some spell should not rise to the penalty of a failed save of a spell at anywhere near a comparable level. But with this design approach, perhaps a +1 slot adjustment will be necessary, and if the feat is allowed to be applied multiple times for multiple effects, there would be a +1 slot markup for every HAE added. Thus, a necromantic spell with [evil] and [cold] descriptors could take a necromancy, OR an evil, OR a cold hits-anyway-effect for one application of the metamagic. With these specifications, the next question becomes whether a caster should be able to take the feat just once and be able to emphasize any school and any descriptor, or should a caster be limited to a certain list of preselected descriptors, not counting spell school, which are chosen when the feat is taken (for example, 3 + magic ability modifier)? Further, I would not as a rule have other metamagics normally be able to enhance the effects of this feat (i.e. no Maximized HAEs). How does this look? Emphasized Spell [this is only a placeholder name, I'm not attached to it or anything] prereqs: ability to cast magic, magic ability score 13+ effect: Choose a number of spell schools equal to magic ability modifier. You can add a 'hits anyway effect' according to spell school, of any spell you cast from those school. (Caster can choose from a list of standardized effects at the time the metamagic feat is applied.) Special: Feat can be taken multiple times, no stacking, choose additional schools each time feat is taken, etc. Improved Emphasized Spell prereq: Emphasized Spell effect: similar to parent feat but choose a number of spell descriptors to Emphasize (standardized effects given for each.) Greater Emphasized Spell other metamagics can enhance Emphasized Spell HAEs ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Need help with metamagic feat idea
Top