Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Negative LA race?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 4707255" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Actually, I think the Gnobler is pretty nasty for the first couple levels of play.</p><p></p><p>At -2 LA, were looking at 3rd level Gnoblers.</p><p></p><p>First of all, with the RAW, 'Tiny' is a fairly huge advantage. While the fact that you are limited to tiny weapons hurts, what that really means is only about -2 to damage. The fact that you don't have reach hurts, but any build is going to be focused on ranged attacks anyway. In compensation for these drawbacks you have +2 to hit, +2 to AC, and +8 to hide. Additionally, I have +4 to Dex and +2 to Con. </p><p></p><p>Twenty-eight point buy gives me something like: Str 4, Dex 14, Con 14, Int 4, Wis 4, Chr 14.</p><p></p><p>I start play as a 3rd level sorcerer: BAB +1, Fort +3, Ref +4, Will -1, 15 hit points (probably best in the party). With no armor, my AC is a fairly average but creditable 14. My 14 charisma gets me 1st and 2nd level bonus spells.</p><p></p><p>I would build a sorcerer that focuses on rays (ranged touch, no save) and attacks which lack saves. I could have a huge +4 to my ranged touch attack rolls, but I'm forced probably to take shaky, but I'm still starting with a decent +2 to hit with ranged attacks. Frail is the other possibily, since I'd still end up with 12 hit points. Still, magic missile for the win - my starting level gives me two for a 4-10 pt damage attack with no need for an attack roll. I start with 6 0 level spells and 6 1st level. For brief peroids, I can do damage comparable to the party two-handed melee fighter. I start with two feats. I think it would be as effective as a '1st level' sorcerer is likely to be. </p><p></p><p>At my 2nd level, I'm gaining 4 second level spells and an attribute point, in addition to the usual extra 1st level spells, +1 to Will Saves, +1 BAB, and 3-6 hit points a sorcerer could expect to pick up. The fact that I'm a 2nd level spell caster with 17 spells is I think more than going to compensate for my weak crossbow attack. At 20 or so hit points, I probably no longer have the most hit points of anyone in the party, but I'm still the envy of the human sorcerer who probably spent their bonus feat on 'Toughness' just to be survivable. I'm clearly as powerful as any races 2nd level sorcerer, and I'm certainly still going to be that when I pick up my 3rd level spells (fireball!) at 4th level (my 6th). </p><p></p><p>At some higher level, my lack of versitility (all my skill points must go to Concentration) and terrible attributes will probably catch up with me and I'll just be 'average'. But in the mean time I'm a pretty effective arcane spellcaster during a portion of the game in which arcane spell casters are usually very challenging to make effective.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 4707255, member: 4937"] Actually, I think the Gnobler is pretty nasty for the first couple levels of play. At -2 LA, were looking at 3rd level Gnoblers. First of all, with the RAW, 'Tiny' is a fairly huge advantage. While the fact that you are limited to tiny weapons hurts, what that really means is only about -2 to damage. The fact that you don't have reach hurts, but any build is going to be focused on ranged attacks anyway. In compensation for these drawbacks you have +2 to hit, +2 to AC, and +8 to hide. Additionally, I have +4 to Dex and +2 to Con. Twenty-eight point buy gives me something like: Str 4, Dex 14, Con 14, Int 4, Wis 4, Chr 14. I start play as a 3rd level sorcerer: BAB +1, Fort +3, Ref +4, Will -1, 15 hit points (probably best in the party). With no armor, my AC is a fairly average but creditable 14. My 14 charisma gets me 1st and 2nd level bonus spells. I would build a sorcerer that focuses on rays (ranged touch, no save) and attacks which lack saves. I could have a huge +4 to my ranged touch attack rolls, but I'm forced probably to take shaky, but I'm still starting with a decent +2 to hit with ranged attacks. Frail is the other possibily, since I'd still end up with 12 hit points. Still, magic missile for the win - my starting level gives me two for a 4-10 pt damage attack with no need for an attack roll. I start with 6 0 level spells and 6 1st level. For brief peroids, I can do damage comparable to the party two-handed melee fighter. I start with two feats. I think it would be as effective as a '1st level' sorcerer is likely to be. At my 2nd level, I'm gaining 4 second level spells and an attribute point, in addition to the usual extra 1st level spells, +1 to Will Saves, +1 BAB, and 3-6 hit points a sorcerer could expect to pick up. The fact that I'm a 2nd level spell caster with 17 spells is I think more than going to compensate for my weak crossbow attack. At 20 or so hit points, I probably no longer have the most hit points of anyone in the party, but I'm still the envy of the human sorcerer who probably spent their bonus feat on 'Toughness' just to be survivable. I'm clearly as powerful as any races 2nd level sorcerer, and I'm certainly still going to be that when I pick up my 3rd level spells (fireball!) at 4th level (my 6th). At some higher level, my lack of versitility (all my skill points must go to Concentration) and terrible attributes will probably catch up with me and I'll just be 'average'. But in the mean time I'm a pretty effective arcane spellcaster during a portion of the game in which arcane spell casters are usually very challenging to make effective. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Negative LA race?
Top