Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Neil Gaiman: Badly Overated?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takyris" data-source="post: 1816064" data-attributes="member: 5171"><p>I've only read <em>American Gods, Sandman,</em> and <em>Neverwhere</em> -- and <em>Good Omens</em>, but I read that before I knew who Gaiman was.</p><p></p><p>I enjoyed <em>American Gods</em> a lot, although I thought of it more as a journey book -- the journey was, for me, more interesting than the destination. That's not a knock -- Neal Stephenson traditionally gives me the worst endings I've read in a long time, but I still read his stuff. </p><p></p><p><em>Neverwhere</em> would have been more interesting had I had a better working knowledge of London. As it was, I was interested in the new fantastical tropes he used and had a good time, but I wasn't moved to tears.</p><p></p><p>And I deeply enjoyed <em>Sandman</em>, although I had to be in the right mood for it. I suppose that's true for anything, but very much more so in this one.</p><p></p><p>I found that I personally enjoyed Gaiman more when he didn't take himself too seriously. His ability to go from brooding barely comprehensible menace to deadpan ironic humor in the blink of an eye is what always made him worth reading for me. That and his interplay between traditional fantasy and new fantasy. Not to hijack, but the biggest problem I have with China Mieville is that he seems so bent on creating new and original fantasy tropes that he doesn't stop to check whether they're any good. Completely and totally just my own opinion, of course. I would read his stuff and go, "Cool, wonderful, neat, stupid, stupid, saw it on Doctor Who, and okay, another cool one, and hey, I hope you're trying to be funny with that one there, because if not, you've unfortunately drifted into camp..."</p><p></p><p>I feel like Gaiman does a better job of taking the cool parts of traditional fantasy and blending in his own unique new fantasy concepts at the same time. He's not trying to fight several thousand years of history and culture, and several decades of established fantasy tropes. For me, it's the difference between paddling against the current with all your might and letting the current take you while you smoothly guide your craft across the river to a new place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takyris, post: 1816064, member: 5171"] I've only read [i]American Gods, Sandman,[/i] and [i]Neverwhere[/i] -- and [i]Good Omens[/i], but I read that before I knew who Gaiman was. I enjoyed [i]American Gods[/i] a lot, although I thought of it more as a journey book -- the journey was, for me, more interesting than the destination. That's not a knock -- Neal Stephenson traditionally gives me the worst endings I've read in a long time, but I still read his stuff. [i]Neverwhere[/i] would have been more interesting had I had a better working knowledge of London. As it was, I was interested in the new fantastical tropes he used and had a good time, but I wasn't moved to tears. And I deeply enjoyed [i]Sandman[/i], although I had to be in the right mood for it. I suppose that's true for anything, but very much more so in this one. I found that I personally enjoyed Gaiman more when he didn't take himself too seriously. His ability to go from brooding barely comprehensible menace to deadpan ironic humor in the blink of an eye is what always made him worth reading for me. That and his interplay between traditional fantasy and new fantasy. Not to hijack, but the biggest problem I have with China Mieville is that he seems so bent on creating new and original fantasy tropes that he doesn't stop to check whether they're any good. Completely and totally just my own opinion, of course. I would read his stuff and go, "Cool, wonderful, neat, stupid, stupid, saw it on Doctor Who, and okay, another cool one, and hey, I hope you're trying to be funny with that one there, because if not, you've unfortunately drifted into camp..." I feel like Gaiman does a better job of taking the cool parts of traditional fantasy and blending in his own unique new fantasy concepts at the same time. He's not trying to fight several thousand years of history and culture, and several decades of established fantasy tropes. For me, it's the difference between paddling against the current with all your might and letting the current take you while you smoothly guide your craft across the river to a new place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Neil Gaiman: Badly Overated?
Top