Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
Netbook of Feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LiquidBlue" data-source="post: 3140265" data-attributes="member: 40911"><p><strong>The Story for Far</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>DIVINE BOON</strong>:</p><p><em>Knight Otu</em> has been the only one to comment on this feat at this time. He wondered whether it applies well to all eligible domain powers.</p><p></p><p><strong>EXTRA RAGE</strong>:</p><p>The discussion of this feat has generally centered on the idea that LEW already has a feat that alls a character to rage more often. <em>Knight Otu</em> pointed out that the WOTC version granted 2 more rages instead of the 1 proposed. <strong>Would this feat be acceptable if it granted 2 extra rages the same as the WOTC version?</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>EXTRA WILD SHAPE</strong>:</p><p>There has been some question on how this feat applies to different version of the wildshape ability. <em>Velmont</em> has expressed the thought that letting a single of instance of the feat improved all of a character's wild shape abilities would be a little strong. WOTC has a version of the feat and it grants two extra wild shapes per feat taken. <strong>Would this feat be acceptable if it granted two extra wild shapes the same as the WOTC version?</strong></p><p></p><p><strong>FIERY RAGE</strong>:</p><p>Fiery Rage has not been commented on yet. If the <em>Lasting Fury</em> feat passes (especially with the resently proposed changes), it seems that this feat will be unnecessary.</p><p></p><p><strong>FOUL SNEAKING</strong>:</p><p><em>Knight Otu</em> has been the only one to comment on this feat, asking whether the feat should act on dazed or act on dazzled creatures.</p><p></p><p><strong>ANIMAL COMPANIONSHIP</strong>:</p><p>This feat has been the subject of the most discussion mostly centered on whether it should stack, whether it should provide more powerful companions on so on. I will change the proposal so that the two alternatives are available to be voted on.</p><p></p><p><strong>IMPROVED SUBDUAL</strong>:</p><p>This feat has not generated any discussion. <em>Knight Otu</em> noted that is seemed okay.</p><p></p><p><strong>INSPIRE COOPERATION</strong>:</p><p>This feat has not generated any discussion. There has been no comments on my idea to expand the feat so that it grants more than one abilities for bardic music</p><p></p><p><strong>PSYCHIC SENSE</strong>:</p><p>After some discussion, this feat has been revised, and now seems to be generally acceptable.</p><p></p><p><strong>SUMMONING CONCENTRATION</strong>:</p><p>This feat has not generated any discussion. <em>Knight Otu</em> noted that is seemed okay.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LiquidBlue, post: 3140265, member: 40911"] [b]The Story for Far[/b] [B]DIVINE BOON[/B]: [I]Knight Otu[/I] has been the only one to comment on this feat at this time. He wondered whether it applies well to all eligible domain powers. [B]EXTRA RAGE[/B]: The discussion of this feat has generally centered on the idea that LEW already has a feat that alls a character to rage more often. [I]Knight Otu[/I] pointed out that the WOTC version granted 2 more rages instead of the 1 proposed. [B]Would this feat be acceptable if it granted 2 extra rages the same as the WOTC version?[/B] [B]EXTRA WILD SHAPE[/B]: There has been some question on how this feat applies to different version of the wildshape ability. [I]Velmont[/I] has expressed the thought that letting a single of instance of the feat improved all of a character's wild shape abilities would be a little strong. WOTC has a version of the feat and it grants two extra wild shapes per feat taken. [B]Would this feat be acceptable if it granted two extra wild shapes the same as the WOTC version?[/B] [B]FIERY RAGE[/B]: Fiery Rage has not been commented on yet. If the [I]Lasting Fury[/I] feat passes (especially with the resently proposed changes), it seems that this feat will be unnecessary. [B]FOUL SNEAKING[/B]: [I]Knight Otu[/I] has been the only one to comment on this feat, asking whether the feat should act on dazed or act on dazzled creatures. [B]ANIMAL COMPANIONSHIP[/B]: This feat has been the subject of the most discussion mostly centered on whether it should stack, whether it should provide more powerful companions on so on. I will change the proposal so that the two alternatives are available to be voted on. [B]IMPROVED SUBDUAL[/B]: This feat has not generated any discussion. [I]Knight Otu[/I] noted that is seemed okay. [B]INSPIRE COOPERATION[/B]: This feat has not generated any discussion. There has been no comments on my idea to expand the feat so that it grants more than one abilities for bardic music [B]PSYCHIC SENSE[/B]: After some discussion, this feat has been revised, and now seems to be generally acceptable. [B]SUMMONING CONCENTRATION[/B]: This feat has not generated any discussion. [I]Knight Otu[/I] noted that is seemed okay. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
Netbook of Feats
Top
