Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tessarael" data-source="post: 8964886" data-attributes="member: 12909">Regarding them getting too much exertion from spell points, perhaps it should be 2 spell points for one exertion level. That would give them 1 exertion point at Warlock level 1, 7 exertion points at Warlock level 9, and 15 exertion points at level 20; but if the Warlock spends spell points in that manner, then they are out of spell points to cast spells which would be more effective typically.The Martial Scholar feat gives an exertion pool of 3, if you have none. It does not give 2x proficiency bonus if you have none. You are correct that a level dip into Fighter will give exertion points of 2x proficiency bonus. For the other martial classes you'd need two levels to get that, which significantly delays gain of Warlock powers. A one level dip into Warlock with the Martialist archetype should not give exertion points of 2x proficiency bonus - maybe 1x proficiency bonus might be reasonable, but I'm still dubious about that - I think it is better to tie it to spell points, to avoid that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tessarael, post: 8964886, member: 12909"] Regarding them getting too much exertion from spell points, perhaps it should be 2 spell points for one exertion level. That would give them 1 exertion point at Warlock level 1, 7 exertion points at Warlock level 9, and 15 exertion points at level 20; but if the Warlock spends spell points in that manner, then they are out of spell points to cast spells which would be more effective typically. The Martial Scholar feat gives an exertion pool of 3, if you have none. It does not give 2x proficiency bonus if you have none. You are correct that a level dip into Fighter will give exertion points of 2x proficiency bonus. For the other martial classes you'd need two levels to get that, which significantly delays gain of Warlock powers. A one level dip into Warlock with the Martialist archetype should not give exertion points of 2x proficiency bonus - maybe 1x proficiency bonus might be reasonable, but I'm still dubious about that - I think it is better to tie it to spell points, to avoid that. [/QUOTE]

Verification