Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 4012390" data-attributes="member: 14506">Zowey, it seems the only ones left on this thread are diggin' the changes.I agree that it reduces the christmas tree effect by artificially setting limits on slots and what those slots can do. Like I said, "A cloak or an amulet can only do this, a feet slot item can only do that etc." If they had just done some stacking limits on items then there would be no, "You have to have a cloak to get this bonus."And I don't really care if magic items are modular in the game and can be ported in or out. I want them in the game and to work appropriately. Rings only at higher level. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />Also, items should be able to take on any form it wants. If I want boots that give +2 to reflex saves and gloves that give +2 to attack when wielding a sword so be it. They just wont stack with similar bonuses. That is how I would have resolved the issue.Not by saying arbitrarily that all neck slot items only give a bonus to defenses and no other item slot can give bonuses to that. Bleh <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

Verification