Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="SkidAce" data-source="post: 7703430" data-attributes="member: 7706">We change the stories for classes right and left all the time, why would we have to leave the barbarian story alone (if thats what you mean)To sum up (and avoid the tangent) I think you have missed the mark on this one by imposing a specific view of barbarian, to the exclusion of others.The word barbarian is very similar to the "story" you mention. Outsiders, tribes, etc. But here is the catch....I have barbarians that are fighters, rogues, etc etc.  Perhaps the class should have been called beserker (re: other thread discussions) to avoid what we are experiencing.  So, I think the zealot makes a fantastic beserker!  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />But I see the point you are trying to make, and respect it.  I just don't think its as integral to the class as you perceive.</blockquote>