Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New base class: Mystic Warrior
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jasin" data-source="post: 2330794" data-attributes="member: 7531"><p>Thanks.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why assassin? Does assassin get anything particularly appropriate that wouldn't be covered by Sor/Wiz + Wuj?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I don't really like this since it cuts them off from some appropriate spells (I think... can't think of many off hand, so maybe it's not so bad) and allows some not-so-appropriate spells like fire shield or mirror image...</p><p></p><p>Then again, are fire shield and mirror image really all that unappropriate? You don't see stuff like that in CTHD, but I can easily imagine something like that showing up in some of the more outrageous wuxia movies...</p><p></p><p>Maybe I've been thinking about this too hard, and my first idea was best: just be a battle sorc (or a bard...) and pick the right spells. Sure, you won't be a high-Wis mystic, instead of being something of a flamboyant airhead (high Cha and Wis as your likely dump stat), but close enough, eh?</p><p></p><p>I guess my reasoning was that if you tell people who want to play magical wuxia warriors "just play a battle sorc" they <em>will</em> eventually pick up some not-so-appropriate but oh-so-useful spells like glitterdust or limited wish, because they can. But if you limit their spell list by cutting out some good but not appropriate spells, you not only ensure better focus, but also leave room for some minor flavour-enhancing bennies elsewhere (like the better skill list or Improved Unarmed Strike).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jasin, post: 2330794, member: 7531"] Thanks. Why assassin? Does assassin get anything particularly appropriate that wouldn't be covered by Sor/Wiz + Wuj? Anyway, I don't really like this since it cuts them off from some appropriate spells (I think... can't think of many off hand, so maybe it's not so bad) and allows some not-so-appropriate spells like fire shield or mirror image... Then again, are fire shield and mirror image really all that unappropriate? You don't see stuff like that in CTHD, but I can easily imagine something like that showing up in some of the more outrageous wuxia movies... Maybe I've been thinking about this too hard, and my first idea was best: just be a battle sorc (or a bard...) and pick the right spells. Sure, you won't be a high-Wis mystic, instead of being something of a flamboyant airhead (high Cha and Wis as your likely dump stat), but close enough, eh? I guess my reasoning was that if you tell people who want to play magical wuxia warriors "just play a battle sorc" they [i]will[/i] eventually pick up some not-so-appropriate but oh-so-useful spells like glitterdust or limited wish, because they can. But if you limit their spell list by cutting out some good but not appropriate spells, you not only ensure better focus, but also leave room for some minor flavour-enhancing bennies elsewhere (like the better skill list or Improved Unarmed Strike). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
New base class: Mystic Warrior
Top