Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UnknownAtThisTime" data-source="post: 5387364" data-attributes="member: 94582">Ditto.&nbsp;I am an admitted WotC &quot;apologist&quot;.&nbsp; I love the &quot;products&quot;, I think the support is fine, and don't have any real issues with their direction in general or even the way they have communicated things.&nbsp; I am not considering goiung to another vendor for my RPG.&nbsp; I want Wizards to succeed.&nbsp;But, the CB currently has some major and very tangible flaws if it is expected to be a viable tool that players are to use going forward.&nbsp; It is more than &quot;growing pains&quot; and &quot;the nature of software development&quot;&nbsp; with a few &quot;bugs&quot;.&nbsp; It demonstrates a lack of either preparedness or ability within a core team that will be VERY important to the company's success.&nbsp;The model WotC has created demands releasing a product like the CB that is much tighter than this product ending up being on &quot;go live&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UnknownAtThisTime, post: 5387364, member: 94582"] Ditto. I am an admitted WotC "apologist". I love the "products", I think the support is fine, and don't have any real issues with their direction in general or even the way they have communicated things. I am not considering goiung to another vendor for my RPG. I want Wizards to succeed. But, the CB currently has some [B]major and very tangible[/B] flaws if it is expected to be a viable tool that players are to use going forward. It is more than "growing pains" and "the nature of software development" with a few "bugs". It demonstrates a lack of either preparedness or ability within a core team that will be VERY important to the company's success. The model WotC has created demands releasing a product like the CB that is much tighter than this product ending up being on "go live". [/QUOTE]

Verification