Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
New changes are afoot for OSRIC!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 9619543" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>Probably because those of us who actually introduce people to the game and such find the idea of trying to change the game to something more akin to 3e as sort of offensive and infuriating. If OSRIC is to be an AD&D, it should be that, not some hybrid fantasy heartbreaker.</p><p></p><p>The polls make it obvious that most wanted it to be a fantasy heartbreaker rather than a clone anymore, so the question of what changes were made I feel are absolutely needed to be able to decide whether to support it or not.</p><p></p><p>it probably will be more popular as a fantasy heartbreaker (but it wouldn't be a AD&D clone anymore and so claiming it is would be sort of not telling the truth, as well as leaving room for someone else to make a true AD&D clone to replace the vacant spot OSRIC used to hold), but turning it from AD&D to a D&D hybrid type game defeats the entire purpose of why I would use it or suggest it to someone else in the first place.</p><p></p><p>That's why I'm curious as to what changes actually occurred with their conversion. Did they use ascending AC, have it as an option, or what? Did they change movement to be more friendly to the VTT? Is it really closer to AD&D now, or isn't it?</p><p></p><p>I know many favor WotC D&D on this site and have no problems with making it closer to WoTC D&D than AD&D, but that doesn't mean that everyone who plays AD&D is in favor of that. The old schoolers may be the minority these days, but that does not make us irrelevant. We may be unpopular with the WotC D&D forms of players these days, but when they hijack our games, it sort of miffs off some of us.</p><p></p><p>Why should they respond? Obviously because some of the suggestions miffed off some of the older gamers who wanted a AD&D clone rather than the popular movement to make everything a 3e clone with aspects of TSR D&D. Is it going to be a true clone, or just a clone in name only. He may be a singular speaker of the thread, but I feel he was speaking for a whole bunch of players who don't speak up but read it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 9619543, member: 4348"] Probably because those of us who actually introduce people to the game and such find the idea of trying to change the game to something more akin to 3e as sort of offensive and infuriating. If OSRIC is to be an AD&D, it should be that, not some hybrid fantasy heartbreaker. The polls make it obvious that most wanted it to be a fantasy heartbreaker rather than a clone anymore, so the question of what changes were made I feel are absolutely needed to be able to decide whether to support it or not. it probably will be more popular as a fantasy heartbreaker (but it wouldn't be a AD&D clone anymore and so claiming it is would be sort of not telling the truth, as well as leaving room for someone else to make a true AD&D clone to replace the vacant spot OSRIC used to hold), but turning it from AD&D to a D&D hybrid type game defeats the entire purpose of why I would use it or suggest it to someone else in the first place. That's why I'm curious as to what changes actually occurred with their conversion. Did they use ascending AC, have it as an option, or what? Did they change movement to be more friendly to the VTT? Is it really closer to AD&D now, or isn't it? I know many favor WotC D&D on this site and have no problems with making it closer to WoTC D&D than AD&D, but that doesn't mean that everyone who plays AD&D is in favor of that. The old schoolers may be the minority these days, but that does not make us irrelevant. We may be unpopular with the WotC D&D forms of players these days, but when they hijack our games, it sort of miffs off some of us. Why should they respond? Obviously because some of the suggestions miffed off some of the older gamers who wanted a AD&D clone rather than the popular movement to make everything a 3e clone with aspects of TSR D&D. Is it going to be a true clone, or just a clone in name only. He may be a singular speaker of the thread, but I feel he was speaking for a whole bunch of players who don't speak up but read it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
New changes are afoot for OSRIC!
Top